The market exploded as soon as the Federal Reserve's December meeting minutes were released. The third rate cut of the year was carried out as planned, with the interest rate range set at 3.50%-3.75%, but the voting results showed a split of 9:3—these 3 dissenting votes directly exposed the true internal struggle. On one side are concerns about inflation rebound, and on the other side are signals of soft employment data; even officials supporting the rate cut openly admit this is a "delicate balance." At a different point in time, some votes might have flipped.
The question is: how many times will the Fed cut rates in 2026? The official stance and the market have already diverged completely. The Fed's dot plot only anticipates one more 25 basis point cut next year, which implies that inflation will stabilize around 2.4% by the end of the year. But the market is betting wildly on another story—CME futures data shows the probability of a 25 basis point cut before March has surged to 45.2%, and there are even 6.5% aggressive expectations supporting a 50 basis point cut. Even more exaggerated, investment banks are collectively taking sides, with giants like Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley predicting a full 50 basis points of room for cuts throughout the year, while Citibank directly calls for an aggressive 75 basis point cut.
The real uncertainty lies in personnel. Powell's era is coming to an end, with Trump set to announce the new chair in January. Two candidates named Kevin are the frontrunners—Kevin Waugh is Trump's top choice, 55 years old, closely connected to JPMorgan Chase, advocating for policy independence and deeper rate cuts, but has disagreements with the president on tariffs. The other Kevin, Hasset, has a higher chance of nomination at 53%, and is a key Trump advisor who openly advocates for "aggressive rate cuts," pushing for low interest rates combined with fiscal stimulus. This combination aligns perfectly with the president's ultimate goal of a 1% interest rate.
Recently, the January 27-28 FOMC meeting is a key node. Currently, the market only assigns a 14.9% probability to a rate cut in January, with most officials adopting a "wait-and-see" attitude based on data. Paradoxically, the unemployment rate in November indeed rose to 4.6%, a new high since 2021, which sounds alarming. But looking closer, the GDP growth in the third quarter still hit a two-year high of 4.3%. One points to a recession, the other to overheating; the policy path remains truly unpredictable.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
OnchainHolmes
· 2025-12-31 03:58
The 9:3 vote split truly reflects the Federal Reserve's real mindset.
Whether to cut rates or not, which of these two Kevins takes office will really rewrite the script.
The market is wildly betting on a 75 basis point hike; investment banks are collectively betting on this move, which is a bit outrageous.
Unemployment hits a new high while GDP is soaring—this contradictory momentum is also giving policymakers a headache.
The meeting on January 27th feels like the real watershed; a 14.9% probability is too low.
If Powell steps down and Trump's people come in, this political shift could have a bigger impact than the data itself.
View OriginalReply0
VitaliksTwin
· 2025-12-31 03:57
What does the 9:3 split mean? It means Powell can no longer control the situation, and the new chair is coming to stir things up.
How many times will they cut interest rates? I think it all depends on who Trump chooses as the new candidate. Hasset's 1% interest rate combo is really crazy.
An unemployment rate of 4.6% is indeed scary, but GDP is still booming. This contradictory vibe... It's just a casino, after all.
Citibank calls for a 75 basis point cut. Is this guy trying to bet on a crash? I can't quite understand the market’s crazy bets this time.
The key is still the meeting on January 27th. A 14.9% probability is too low; it feels like as soon as the data improves, they’ll switch directly.
View OriginalReply0
BoredStaker
· 2025-12-31 03:50
9:3 voting directly exposes the internal rift within the Federal Reserve, this is the real drama.
If Hasset takes office, it really feels like a 1% interest rate might be possible...
Unemployment rate hits a new high + GDP soars, these contradictory data points make the Fed itself fight over decision-making.
The market and official statements are completely at odds, it’s a bit like betting on the policy direction of Trump’s new chairmanship.
How many rate cuts will there be in 2026 is really uncertain; it mainly depends on how the vote goes at the January 27 meeting.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-a5fa8bd0
· 2025-12-31 03:43
The 9:3 split directly indicates that there is already a rift within the Federal Reserve. It’s really not easy for Powell to stabilize the situation.
The market and the authorities are completely out of sync regarding the rate cuts. Investment banks are betting wildly, with Citi calling for a 75 basis point cut—it's basically a gamble for their lives.
Kevin Hasset’s aggressive rate cut plus fiscal stimulus combo sounds just like a replay of Trump’s 1% interest rate dream.
Unemployment at 4.6%, a new high, combined with a GDP growth of 4.3%, a two-year high—this contradictory situation is truly perplexing. Who can clearly say how policies will unfold?
January 27-28 is the real showtime. Now, with so few people betting on rate cuts, it actually makes the possibility seem greater?
The market exploded as soon as the Federal Reserve's December meeting minutes were released. The third rate cut of the year was carried out as planned, with the interest rate range set at 3.50%-3.75%, but the voting results showed a split of 9:3—these 3 dissenting votes directly exposed the true internal struggle. On one side are concerns about inflation rebound, and on the other side are signals of soft employment data; even officials supporting the rate cut openly admit this is a "delicate balance." At a different point in time, some votes might have flipped.
The question is: how many times will the Fed cut rates in 2026? The official stance and the market have already diverged completely. The Fed's dot plot only anticipates one more 25 basis point cut next year, which implies that inflation will stabilize around 2.4% by the end of the year. But the market is betting wildly on another story—CME futures data shows the probability of a 25 basis point cut before March has surged to 45.2%, and there are even 6.5% aggressive expectations supporting a 50 basis point cut. Even more exaggerated, investment banks are collectively taking sides, with giants like Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley predicting a full 50 basis points of room for cuts throughout the year, while Citibank directly calls for an aggressive 75 basis point cut.
The real uncertainty lies in personnel. Powell's era is coming to an end, with Trump set to announce the new chair in January. Two candidates named Kevin are the frontrunners—Kevin Waugh is Trump's top choice, 55 years old, closely connected to JPMorgan Chase, advocating for policy independence and deeper rate cuts, but has disagreements with the president on tariffs. The other Kevin, Hasset, has a higher chance of nomination at 53%, and is a key Trump advisor who openly advocates for "aggressive rate cuts," pushing for low interest rates combined with fiscal stimulus. This combination aligns perfectly with the president's ultimate goal of a 1% interest rate.
Recently, the January 27-28 FOMC meeting is a key node. Currently, the market only assigns a 14.9% probability to a rate cut in January, with most officials adopting a "wait-and-see" attitude based on data. Paradoxically, the unemployment rate in November indeed rose to 4.6%, a new high since 2021, which sounds alarming. But looking closer, the GDP growth in the third quarter still hit a two-year high of 4.3%. One points to a recession, the other to overheating; the policy path remains truly unpredictable.