Interesting phenomenon: a certain platform announced that it would increase creators' revenue share, but it instead angered a large number of people. What underlying mindset is behind this reaction? Worth pondering.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
CountdownToBroke
· 16h ago
Uh... isn't this just the story of "The Boy Who Cried Wolf" playing out again?
People have been burned too many times already, and now they are more cautious when hearing good news.
There is no such thing as a free lunch in the world, really.
View OriginalReply0
SilentObserver
· 16h ago
Why is it all backwards? When the price goes up, you still get scolded?
View OriginalReply0
FlashLoanLarry
· 16h ago
yo this is peak opportunity cost math tbh—they're probably just realizing the platform already extracted max value from that *particular* incentive structure. once you change the parameters mid-game, everyone recalculates their edge... and finds out they're on the wrong side of it now lol
Reply0
DiamondHands
· 16h ago
Really, it's so true. Dividing the points is just a hint that they were exploiting creators earlier.
View OriginalReply0
DYORMaster
· 17h ago
Oh, this thing, to put it simply, is a trust bankruptcy. No matter how good the promises are, they are all useless.
Interesting phenomenon: a certain platform announced that it would increase creators' revenue share, but it instead angered a large number of people. What underlying mindset is behind this reaction? Worth pondering.