Imagine a regulatory sweep targeting: memecoins, leveraged derivatives, prediction markets, plus OnlyFans, Instagram, Uber Eats and DoorDash. Sounds tough, right?
Here's the real question: would society actually improve? Or are we just fooling ourselves?
Think about it—banning perpetuals and leverage kills risk management tools along with the speculation. Memecoins vanish, sure, but so does retail engagement in crypto. Prediction markets get axed, yet forecasting accuracy takes a hit. Meanwhile, OnlyFans and Instagram restrictions? DoorDash and Uber Eats controls? You're talking about disrupting entire economic ecosystems.
The trade-offs are brutal. Protection comes at the cost of freedom and innovation. Is that really a better world, or just a different flavor of problems? Worth asking before we celebrate the crackdown.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LostBetweenChains
· 23h ago
A one-size-fits-all regulation can solve the problem? Wake up. In the end, it might just be a different way to continue harvesting the little guys.
View OriginalReply0
rekt_but_not_broke
· 23h ago
ngl This is a typical case of "destroying the entire ecosystem for safety"... Do you really think banning leverage can save the market? LOL Are retail investors supposed to be protected like this?
View OriginalReply0
MidnightSeller
· 23h ago
Forbidden a fart, just cut leeks in a different way
View OriginalReply0
OnchainUndercover
· 23h ago
Banning again and again, can it really improve society? I don't think so...
---
Layered regulation, in the end, small retail investors are the ones who suffer
---
Instead of cutting leverage, why not first regulate market manipulation?
---
Laughing to death, banning meme coins—how can retail play? Do they have to go back to buying Moutai?
---
Protection in the name of freedom, deprivation of rights—an eternal power game
---
Always a trade-off, there is no perfect solution, it all depends on whose voice is louder
---
Remembered, every time there is large-scale regulation, someone cheers, and then a year later, the problems are still there
---
Without risk management tools, do risks really disappear? That's funny
---
Mixing OnlyFans, DoorDash, and meme coins... this logic is a bit extreme
---
Systemic risk and freedom of innovation have always been mortal enemies, they can't coexist
Imagine a regulatory sweep targeting: memecoins, leveraged derivatives, prediction markets, plus OnlyFans, Instagram, Uber Eats and DoorDash. Sounds tough, right?
Here's the real question: would society actually improve? Or are we just fooling ourselves?
Think about it—banning perpetuals and leverage kills risk management tools along with the speculation. Memecoins vanish, sure, but so does retail engagement in crypto. Prediction markets get axed, yet forecasting accuracy takes a hit. Meanwhile, OnlyFans and Instagram restrictions? DoorDash and Uber Eats controls? You're talking about disrupting entire economic ecosystems.
The trade-offs are brutal. Protection comes at the cost of freedom and innovation. Is that really a better world, or just a different flavor of problems? Worth asking before we celebrate the crackdown.