2025-12-30 23:22:19

The TVS plus IWO combination scheme for this project is indeed interesting—supporting a healthier token launch process through structured liquidity management. Compared to traditional wild growth models, this mechanism is more friendly to long-term holders and significantly reduces rug risks.

The leaderboard competition system is well-designed, making participants' contributions feel more genuine. Especially with the dual-epoch operation concept, which uses phased incentive designs to filter out the top 500 holders, ensuring ample liquidity while allowing those who truly believe in the project to receive proportional rewards. Overall, the logical cycle feels more resilient than simply using TVS or IWO alone.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

RugPullAlarm

· 15h ago

Uh, wait a minute, the top 500 holders? Where did this data come from? Has it been verified on-chain?

View OriginalReply0

ColdWalletGuardian

· 16h ago

I think this epoch design is pretty good. Finally, I see a project that isn't just blindly dumping tokens. It feels like it can last a bit longer.

View OriginalReply0

BoredStaker

· 16h ago

This epoch design I have to say is truly awesome, finally no need to worry about being cut. --- I like this leaderboard competition setup, unlike those projects, which are full of participation. --- The combination of TVS+IWO feels indeed promising, much more reliable than traditional reckless operations. --- The idea of screening the top 500 participants is good; only when liquidity stabilizes can it be the way to go. --- I support the phased approach of double epoch; it avoids too many dilution risks. --- Resilience is indeed the core of this plan, directly reducing the rug risk. --- Pure TVS or IWO are already outdated; this kind of combination is the right path. --- Long-term holders are in luck; the incentive mechanism finally justifies us. --- Structured liquidity management sounds more reliable than reckless growth.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidationWizard

· 16h ago

The design of selecting 500 people over two epochs is quite interesting, but I'm worried it might just be the old trick of looking perfect on the surface but ending up poorly executed in the end.

View OriginalReply0