2025-12-30 09:28:28

Google's latest research has uncovered something interesting: Transformer models are not simply memorizing by rote, but are building a knowledge map within their weight matrices, weaving the relationships between various concepts.

Sounds like cutting-edge technology, right? Even more impressive — in adversarial tasks, these models can actually learn multi-hop reasoning. Researchers tested with a graph of 50,000 nodes and 10-hop paths, and the model achieved a 100% accuracy in predicting unseen paths. What does this imply? It suggests that the model is not relying on rote memorization but truly understanding that network of relationships.

This development challenges many of our preconceived notions about AI knowledge storage. If the model is indeed implicitly encoding global relationships, it can unleash its creative potential, but it might also make editing and controlling the knowledge more difficult. In other words, we need to rethink how we manage and optimize the "knowledge maps" behind these models.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

FUD_Whisperer

· 14h ago

Damn, 100% accuracy? Doesn't that mean it really understands logic, not just memorizing? Crazy, so what's the point of our previous prompt engineering? Honestly, I want to ask, if it can really weave its own relationship network, how can we ensure that what it outputs is reliable? A bit scary, feels like we're about to lose our jobs. Wait, does this mean that the current models are actually much smarter than we thought? The knowledge map sounds awesome, but how can we be sure that its "understanding" is correct? No wonder recent prompts need to be revised; it turns out it has been building its own knowledge system all along. This is great, but controlling AI output will be even harder in the future. Google’s research might actually be digging its own grave. That 100% figure is a bit too perfect. Could it be that the test set itself has issues?

View OriginalReply0

ETH_Maxi_Taxi

· 14h ago

Damn, is the transformer really secretly building a knowledge map? Now I understand why those large models are getting more and more outrageous. --- 100% accuracy? That's nonsense, we need to see how they test it. --- Interesting, the relationship network of the entire world is hidden in the weight matrix. --- I'm just worried that these models will become even harder to control in the future. We really need new management methods. --- Multi-hop reasoning is so impressive; isn't this similar to the principle of chain of thought? --- I like the term "knowledge map," it feels much more fitting than the word "black box." --- Wait, does this mean AI actually has much stronger understanding ability than we thought? --- I believe in creative potential, but the doubled difficulty of control is also pretty scary.

View OriginalReply0

DuckFluff

· 14h ago

Whoa, 100% accuracy? Isn't this cheating? Is it real or fake?

View OriginalReply0

ShadowStaker

· 14h ago

tbh the 100% accuracy on unseen paths is where it gets spicy... but let's pump the brakes on the "true understanding" rhetoric. still just matrix gymnastics, albeit sophisticated ones. what actually matters? can we audit these knowledge maps or are we just trusting the black box again lmao

Reply0

BottomMisser

· 14h ago

Whoa, 100% accuracy? If that's not rote memorization, then that's incredible. --- So, transformer is actually secretly learning logic? I'm a bit scared now. --- The idea of a knowledge map sounds good, but controlling it must be even more challenging. --- If multi-hop reasoning can reach 100%, then our previous understanding of the model might really need to be overhauled. --- The entire knowledge graph is hidden inside the weight matrix—just thinking about it is amazing. --- Now, AI not only copies our stuff but is truly "understanding" it. --- Can predict paths we've never seen before—does that mean it really learned, or is it just another round of overfitting? --- Google's new research means the textbooks might have to be rewritten again. --- Implicit encoding of global relationships—why does that sound so terrifying?

View OriginalReply0

GasGuzzler

· 14h ago

Wow, 100% accuracy? Doesn't that mean the model is really doing reasoning rather than just memorizing the database? That's a bit scary haha

View OriginalReply0