Grasping the mechanics behind TVS requires going through a few token launch cycles to really understand what's happening.
Here's what you'll notice: most token launches follow a predictable script, and spoiler alert—the price usually tanks.
Why? Because the initial liquidity pool gets bloated beyond what the project can actually sustain. You've got capital flooding in at Day 1, but there's minimal real utility or user adoption to back it up. The math doesn't work: more tokens hitting the market than genuine demand can absorb.
It doesn't matter if the project is fundamentally sound. The structural imbalance between available liquidity and authentic usage creates selling pressure that's hard to overcome. Whales exit, retail follows, and the price discovery process becomes brutal.
This is why understanding token supply dynamics and liquidity positioning before launch is critical. Not all dumps are created equal—some signal a flawed tokenomics model, others reflect market conditions. The difference between a project that survives and one that doesn't often comes down to whether the team designed for sustainable liquidity rather than just Day 1 hype.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
Blockblind
· 11h ago
In simple terms, most projects drain all the funds on the first day, then no one uses it, and the price naturally collapses.
View OriginalReply0
GlueGuy
· 11h ago
Basically, most project teams haven't thought about how to survive long-term; they only focus on Day 1 traffic.
Terrible tokenomics can be seen at a glance, but unfortunately, most people are still fooled.
Liquidity pools collapse as soon as they are hyped, and that's the real killer move.
View OriginalReply0
rekt_but_vibing
· 11h ago
Basically, the project team hyped up the liquidity like crazy, but no one used it... Day 1 everyone rushed in, and Day 2 they all ran away collectively.
View OriginalReply0
StakeOrRegret
· 11h ago
Basically, it's just liquidity inflation without actual demand to back it up.
View OriginalReply0
HorizonHunter
· 11h ago
Basically, token launches all follow the same pattern—liquidity is artificially inflated and can't be sustained.
The sky-high prices are just for the bagholders; without real demand, no matter how much money is invested, it's all in vain.
Grasping the mechanics behind TVS requires going through a few token launch cycles to really understand what's happening.
Here's what you'll notice: most token launches follow a predictable script, and spoiler alert—the price usually tanks.
Why? Because the initial liquidity pool gets bloated beyond what the project can actually sustain. You've got capital flooding in at Day 1, but there's minimal real utility or user adoption to back it up. The math doesn't work: more tokens hitting the market than genuine demand can absorb.
It doesn't matter if the project is fundamentally sound. The structural imbalance between available liquidity and authentic usage creates selling pressure that's hard to overcome. Whales exit, retail follows, and the price discovery process becomes brutal.
This is why understanding token supply dynamics and liquidity positioning before launch is critical. Not all dumps are created equal—some signal a flawed tokenomics model, others reflect market conditions. The difference between a project that survives and one that doesn't often comes down to whether the team designed for sustainable liquidity rather than just Day 1 hype.