That $22M in fees heading to cash-outs? Here's the thing—it should fuel buybacks instead. Real talk: accumulating capital for growth doesn't mean dumping it the moment you can. You either build or you bail. The community's got a point here: strategic capital deployment through repurchases signals conviction, not just extraction. Growth mode requires a different mindset altogether.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MercilessHalal
· 5h ago
22M should be used for buyback, selling this set makes me sick to my stomach
View OriginalReply0
ruggedSoBadLMAO
· 6h ago
Buybacks are indeed much more reliable than direct withdrawals... but the figure of 22M still hurts a bit.
View OriginalReply0
LonelyAnchorman
· 6h ago
Buyback or withdrawal, this is the test of faith. True builders won't back down at critical moments.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainFoodie
· 6h ago
bruh $22M for withdrawal fees? that's like charging michelin prices for frozen dinner vibes. if they're actually redeploying for buybacks instead of just kitchen-dumping capital, that's actually the farm-to-fork strategy we've been screaming for 🍽️
Reply0
MetaverseMortgage
· 6h ago
Such a large amount of money isn't used for buybacks but instead withdrawn? I'm truly speechless. The community still has to teach you how to play.
That $22M in fees heading to cash-outs? Here's the thing—it should fuel buybacks instead. Real talk: accumulating capital for growth doesn't mean dumping it the moment you can. You either build or you bail. The community's got a point here: strategic capital deployment through repurchases signals conviction, not just extraction. Growth mode requires a different mindset altogether.