The progress of code auditing actually reflects the true launch pace of a project. My view is that completing the testing phase usually means that TGE has some time before it occurs, rather than launching immediately. The logic is straightforward—if you rush to launch right after testing ends, the risks will be very high. For projects like $LIT that attract a lot of market attention, any initial failures can trigger chain reactions, with impacts far beyond expectations. The prudent approach is to allow sufficient buffer time for thorough preparation and verification at each stage, which is the most responsible choice for the project's long-term reputation and user confidence.