2025-12-30 07:22:45

Beware of the tricks of RWA!

To be honest, many RWA projects nowadays are just a numbers game—assets are inflated, but the actual cash flow is a mess.

But recently, I've seen quite a few discussions about the SAIL.r model, which indeed has a different logic: real e-commerce brands sell products online, and every income generated is genuine revenue. Then, these earnings are directly converted into stablecoins and distributed to users according to their on-chain holdings ratio.

This closed loop from "virtual assets" to "real cash flow" is indeed easier to verify compared to those paper wealth RWA projects. Of course, the specific details still require your own research, but this approach is worth paying attention to.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GweiWatcher

· 14h ago

Tired of projects that hype up numbers, SAIL.r with its real gold and silver logic is indeed refreshing. Just looking at e-commerce actual transaction volume converted to stablecoins for distribution is much better than those pie-in-the-sky RWA projects, but I still need to dig into the details. As long as cash flow can be verified, that's all that matters; otherwise, it's just another scam to harvest new investors. I stopped believing in projects that inflate asset sizes to sky-high levels. On-chain real transaction data can be verified, and this time it really feels a bit different. The closed-loop system of SAIL.r doesn't sound so far-fetched, and at least I see some real substance. There are too many scammers in the RWA track, finally someone who takes cash flow seriously.

View OriginalReply0

SeasonedInvestor

· 14h ago

Speaking of SAIL.r, this logic really hit my pain point. A real cash flow closed loop is much more reliable than those bragging about RWA. Huh, finally someone has figured out how to directly allocate e-commerce income on-chain. This is truly verifiable stuff. RWA's methods of cutting leeks are just a few, but real revenue distribution with actual cash... feels like this approach is indeed a bit different. I'm tired of those paper wealth figures. I want to see if SAIL.r can really stay stable in a bear market. Genuine e-commerce income, I believe in this. It's much more transparent than virtual assets.

View OriginalReply0

MevWhisperer

· 14h ago

Real cash flow is the key, those RWA projects that just talk are long overdue to die. I need to look into the SAIL.r logic; converting real e-commerce income into stablecoins... at least it's verifiable, unlike some projects that just make empty promises. Paper wealth has fooled too many retail investors; this time, there are some tangible things.

View OriginalReply0

LeverageAddict

· 14h ago

Real cash flow is king, and the numbers on paper are too empty. SAIL.r is a way of thinking that really captures the pain points. --- Another RWA project bragging, I got tired of it. However, SAIL.r's logic of receiving on-chain allocations from e-commerce camps is quite interesting. --- The key is to see the actual realization, not the next shattered dream. --- E-commerce real money revenue to stablecoin distribution? This framework is a hundred times more reliable than those paper RWAs. --- To put it bluntly, it depends on who is really doing business and who is telling stories. SAIL.r has at least real trading data as a basis. --- The pit of RWA has been stepped on enough, and the first thing to look at the project now is to ask: Where does your cash flow come from? --- The good thing about this model is that it can be verified on-chain, not just listening to the financier's story. You still have to pick it up yourself. --- The cash flow closed loop is indeed more reliable than the size of assets, but the details are devilish.

View OriginalReply0