2025-12-30 07:20:16

Having participated in two trading competitions, the differences are quite obvious. In the previous top project trading competition, I netted 140U, with slippage almost negligible. This time's new project event was tough; the project's strategy was clearly more aggressive, with full intent to dump. The settings of the market maker bots were ridiculously precise, and the trading difficulty suddenly increased. I suffered losses yesterday, losing dozens of dollars directly. After realizing this, I changed my strategy, abandoning the pursuit of zero slippage and switching to regular score-chasing trading. Operating normally at this pace for two days, I can basically score enough points to stay on the leaderboard steadily, aiming to use the ranking rewards to offset previous losses. As for the subsequent second-phase competition? Forget it, the difficulty indeed exceeded expectations. I'll reflect seriously and decide later.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

17 Likes

Reward
17
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

AirDropMissed

· 11h ago

The market maker robot is unbelievably accurate. I really got wrecked this time.

View OriginalReply0

fren.eth

· 11h ago

Damn, this time the market maker is clearly playing for real. The previous one was just giving it away for free. --- Losing just a few tens of dollars, this bot's parameters are really impressive. --- Head projects and new projects are two different concepts. No wonder so many people are quitting. --- Stably ranking with 16 points shows this approach is still clear-headed. Surrendering and switching strategies is quite wise. --- The project team's tactics are a bit ruthless. Next time, I really need to think carefully before coming back. --- You can see the depth of water just from the slippage; the difference between 140U and losing money is huge. --- Adjust your strategy in time, or you'll just sink deeper and deeper. --- This difficulty truly exceeds expectations, but the idea of compensating for losses with ranking rewards is not bad.

View OriginalReply0

FlashLoanKing

· 11h ago

This time the market maker is really ruthless, with the robot settings being ridiculously precise. --- Losing is just losing, the key is to learn to admit defeat. Climbing the ranks and earning rewards is the right way. --- The top project made 140u this time, and now they're directly doing the opposite operation, which is indeed a bit embarrassing. --- Changing the strategy can steadily earn 16 points, indicating that the previous approach was indeed wrong. You still need to take a few more losses. --- If the difficulty exceeds expectations, don't force the second phase. Those who cut losses in time tend to live longer. --- The robot settings are so precise that the project team really wants to wash everyone out. --- Switching to a new approach of earning points—that's the operation of smart people. There's no need to suffer zero damage. --- One event earned 140u, another lost dozens of dollars. The experience difference this time is indeed quite significant. --- Just reflect on it; don't jump into the same pit again next time. --- The phrase "full of intent to dump" says everything. The market maker is definitely laying an ambush.

View OriginalReply0

Degen4Breakfast

· 11h ago

This time the dealer really has no sense of sportsmanship; the robot is trained to behave just like a real person.

View OriginalReply0