South Korea's digital asset regulation journey has encountered new issues. According to the latest information, the government version of the "Digital Asset Basic Law" may not be submitted until next year, reflecting higher demands for investor protection and market order.



The new bill aims to strengthen reserve requirements for stablecoins—requiring issuers to hold reserves exceeding 100%, and these reserves must be held in banks or government bond assets. Additionally, digital asset service providers will be liable for no-fault compensation in case of hacker attacks or system failures. It sounds very strict, but it also reflects the regulatory authorities' serious attitude toward market risks.

However, the real sticking point lies in the details. How to define stablecoin issuers, how the central bank and the Financial Services Commission should divide responsibilities, and what the capital requirements should be—these issues are still being debated between the Bank of Korea and the Financial Services Commission. This also indicates that even if policy directions are aligned, the coordination costs during implementation are not insignificant.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
gas_fee_therapistvip
· 13h ago
Is this regulation going to be delayed for another year? The Bank of Korea and the Financial Services Commission are still arguing, just passing the buck to each other.
View OriginalReply0
OnlyUpOnlyvip
· 13h ago
Waiting until next year again? Korea is still arguing, and things here are probably even more uncertain.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-5854de8bvip
· 13h ago
It won't be out until next year... another year to wait, Korea's speed is really slow.
View OriginalReply0
RiddleMastervip
· 13h ago
Another year has passed without any progress. Korea is still arguing internally. Does that mean stablecoins need 100% reserves to be trustworthy? Isn't that essentially treating stablecoins like banks? How is that still considered crypto?
View OriginalReply0
CoffeeNFTradervip
· 13h ago
Korea is causing trouble again. The central bank and the Financial Committee are still arguing, when will this procrastination be cured?
View OriginalReply0
MoneyBurnervip
· 13h ago
Ha, delaying until next year again? Korea is still arguing about it. I just laugh at the reserve ratio being over 100%. How can stablecoins arbitrage and build positions then?
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)