In the world of crypto, flowery words are everywhere, but on-chain data is the absolute truth. Over the past month and a half, the most popular meme coin launchpad in the Solana ecosystem, Pump.fun, quietly poured $605 million into Kraken. Where did this money come from? It was the proceeds from early-stage sales of the $PUMP tokens.
This move instantly caused an explosion. The community went into a frenzy, with all kinds of speculation flying around—are the team planning to run off with the cash? Suddenly, $PUMP plummeted from its launch price by about 55%. Even more intense, there are a bunch of class-action lawsuits brewing against the Pump.fun ecosystem in the US courts.
What’s really going on? Let’s break down this storm.
**Words vs. On-Chain Facts, They’re Always Two Different Things**
What does the project team say? They claim this is normal financial management, transferring funds to different wallets is just for business expansion, and there’s absolutely no intention of cashing out.
But the story on the blockchain is completely different. Starting mid-November this year, wallets associated with fundraising began continuously transferring USDC stablecoins to Kraken. By December 27th, the total had reached $605 million. And on that very day, another $50 million was transferred over.
You tell me, transferring money nonstop to an exchange, what else could it be besides cashing out? That’s why the community exploded. The project team’s words don’t match the data—this stark contrast is enough to expose any explanation.
When on-chain data clashes with official statements, community trust begins to crumble. This isn’t just a Pump.fun issue; it’s a credibility hit for the entire ecosystem.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
CryptoPhoenix
· 13h ago
Oh no, it's the same old trick. Where's the promised business expansion?
Remember, the most important thing when losing money is to stay clear-headed. On-chain data never lies.
The opportunity for rebirth and transformation is at the bottom where trust collapses. Just waiting.
This wave of decline is actually preparing for the next round of selecting participants. Only true believers can survive the cycle.
View OriginalReply0
RektButAlive
· 13h ago
It's the same old story, full of flowery words but data that contradicts them.
Pump.fun's move is truly outstanding; throwing 600 million into exchanges and still calling it "business expansion."
Honestly, I've seen this kind of thing many times; just waiting for another round of rug pulls.
The truth will be revealed on the blockchain; being stubborn really doesn't help.
View OriginalReply0
Rugman_Walking
· 13h ago
Another excuse of "business expansion," hilarious. Do on-chain transfers lie?
View OriginalReply0
NFTragedy
· 13h ago
It's the same old story, talking is useless; looking at on-chain data is the most reliable.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunterZhang
· 13h ago
Haha, it's the same old story. Where's the promised business expansion? Going all-in on the exchange is just ridiculous.
Those who freeloaded on PUMP are probably all wiped out now. I knew the tactics were deep.
On-chain data never lies. This time, the team really can't hold it together anymore.
In the world of crypto, flowery words are everywhere, but on-chain data is the absolute truth. Over the past month and a half, the most popular meme coin launchpad in the Solana ecosystem, Pump.fun, quietly poured $605 million into Kraken. Where did this money come from? It was the proceeds from early-stage sales of the $PUMP tokens.
This move instantly caused an explosion. The community went into a frenzy, with all kinds of speculation flying around—are the team planning to run off with the cash? Suddenly, $PUMP plummeted from its launch price by about 55%. Even more intense, there are a bunch of class-action lawsuits brewing against the Pump.fun ecosystem in the US courts.
What’s really going on? Let’s break down this storm.
**Words vs. On-Chain Facts, They’re Always Two Different Things**
What does the project team say? They claim this is normal financial management, transferring funds to different wallets is just for business expansion, and there’s absolutely no intention of cashing out.
But the story on the blockchain is completely different. Starting mid-November this year, wallets associated with fundraising began continuously transferring USDC stablecoins to Kraken. By December 27th, the total had reached $605 million. And on that very day, another $50 million was transferred over.
You tell me, transferring money nonstop to an exchange, what else could it be besides cashing out? That’s why the community exploded. The project team’s words don’t match the data—this stark contrast is enough to expose any explanation.
When on-chain data clashes with official statements, community trust begins to crumble. This isn’t just a Pump.fun issue; it’s a credibility hit for the entire ecosystem.