I came across a rather sobering data comparison and want to discuss this with everyone.



Many people trading cryptocurrencies tend to think of losses and gains as being too symmetrical. But the reality is quite the opposite— the more you lose, the exponentially harder it becomes to turn things around.

Just look at the data: a stop-loss within -20% still offers a decent cost-performance ratio. Once it drops to -30%, you need a 43% increase to break even. The deeper the fall, the more outrageous the percentage gain required to recover. This is no longer something that can be solved by trading skills alone; it's purely math messing with us.

Let's consider a more realistic comparison—suppose you have 1,000,000 in principal, and you have two options:

Option 1: Steadily compound 5% annually for 3 years

Option 2: +50% in the first year, +50% in the second year, then -50% in the third year

The second option looks more exciting and tempting, but when you actually do the math, it’s eye-opening—earning a steady 5% is actually more profitable than wild swings of gains and losses.

This is the most overlooked point in crypto trading: many can make big money, but those who survive the longest and stay stable rely not on one big win, but on avoiding one or two fatal drawdowns. In this market, surviving is more valuable than winning.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
AirdropBuffetvip
· 12h ago
Really, the last sentence hit me—living is more valuable than winning money. I went all-in with 50%, and I cracked up. Math doesn't lie; those who cherish life are the real winners. A -50% return requires a 100% increase to break even—it's hard to believe. Steady compound interest is truly awesome; I’ve had an epiphany.
View OriginalReply0
WhaleMinionvip
· 2025-12-30 05:54
Math is really ruthless; a -30% drop requires a 43% increase to break even. That price difference is outrageous.
View OriginalReply0
DecentralizeMevip
· 2025-12-30 05:53
Damn, a -30% drop needs a 43% increase to break even? Math is really incredible. I should have listened to this earlier. Every time I try to double up, I end up getting deeper and deeper. Living steadily really earns more than going all-in and gambling. I know this logically, but actually doing it is the real challenge. That example of a million in three years really hit me. Clearly, a steady 5% is more profitable, but I just can't help but gamble. The year with a -50% drop must have been mentally devastating. No wonder they say that staying alive is more important than winning money. It's really just greed at play, always thinking the next surge will come. But then a -50% drop takes you back to square one. This time I think I’ve been cured. Maybe I need to change my trading style. Drawdowns are truly the invisible killer; many people die because of them.
View OriginalReply0
JustHereForAirdropsvip
· 2025-12-30 05:52
Really, a -50% drop can wipe out two years of gains; math will never lie.
View OriginalReply0
MetaDreamervip
· 2025-12-30 05:46
How many people did this math problem kill? A 30% loss requires a 43% increase to break even. Just thinking about it is despairing.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)