2025-12-30 05:01:54

Lighter's recent major moves are worth paying attention to. They are launching their own ecosystem token LIT, which will be directly issued by a US C-Corp to align incentive distribution within the ecosystem.

How to understand this logic? Simply put, the revenue from DEX and future fees generated by other products will be on-chain and traceable, then flexibly allocated based on market conditions—either to support ecosystem growth or to buy back tokens. This design approach is mainly aimed at creating real value for token holders in the long term.

Regarding token distribution, 50% is allocated to ecosystem development, while the team and investors each hold 25%, making it relatively balanced. The goal for the 2025 points season is to distribute a total of 1250 incentive units. This design tightly binds the interests of participants and project parties, which is a common governance approach in Web3 projects.

LIT3,59%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

17 Likes

Reward
17
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SchrodingerWallet

· 01-02 02:30

It seems to be the same old "on-chain revenue, flexible scheduling" routine, nice in theory but questionable in execution? Uh... Wait, 50% ecosystem, 50% team investors, this distribution isn't that outrageous, but why do I always feel like it's just a big pie in the sky? 1250 units of incentives sound pretty tempting, but I'm worried it's just the last wave of cutting before the final harvest. Is it true? Issuing a US C-Corp can ensure transparency? I don't think so. The DEX revenue buyback part is still somewhat interesting, at least it's not purely a fundraising model. Another token... My wallet is full of these "value-creating" things.

View OriginalReply0

NFTRegretDiary

· 01-01 22:48

Both tokens and incentives sound great, but I'm just worried it might be a scam again. --- A 50/50 split looks balanced, but in reality? It's still the investors who call the shots. --- Let's wait and see the actual distribution data; too many promises on paper. --- The 50% allocation for ecosystem development sounds like a lot, but I don't know how it will actually be used. --- When will the buyback token strategy actually allow retail investors to make real money? --- It feels like Lighter is serious about their work, but can we trust Web3's promises? --- Does "flexible scheduling" just mean arbitrary adjustments... --- With 1250 units of incentives, how much can be split? If you're bad at math, don't fool me.

View OriginalReply0

RetailTherapist

· 2025-12-30 15:15

Is this allocation ratio really balanced? Half for the team and investors. It still feels like a significant harvest.

View OriginalReply0

RealYieldWizard

· 2025-12-30 05:31

Lighter's recent moves are pretty good, and the 50% distribution ratio of the ecosystem seems quite thoughtful. Does anyone really care about the buyback logic, or is it just for concept hype? 1250 units of incentives? Will it turn into just another air coin story in the next quarter?

View OriginalReply0

WagmiAnon

· 2025-12-30 05:25

Sounds reliable. I'm quite optimistic about the 50% allocation for ecosystem development.

View OriginalReply0

LidoStakeAddict

· 2025-12-30 05:25

Hey, wait, issuing a US C-Corp? This tactic is pretty interesting, what are they trying to avoid? The ecosystem accounts for 50%... feels okay, just depends on whether the team is genuinely committed.

View OriginalReply0

ReverseTrendSister

· 2025-12-30 05:24

It's all about tokens and incentives, but how many can actually be implemented? Looking at Lighter's approach, they talk a good game about 50% ecosystem development, but the key is how they execute it moving forward.

View OriginalReply0

MercilessHalal

· 2025-12-30 05:22

Wait, 50% for the ecosystem? The allocation still seems a bit generous to the team... But the buyback mechanism is pretty well done, at least it's not just a pure rug pull scheme.

View OriginalReply0

ProveMyZK

· 2025-12-30 05:11

Lighter's gameplay this time is pretty good, and the setup where the C-Corp directly issues tokens is quite interesting... We'll have to see if it truly goes on-chain and becomes traceable later on. I've heard a lot about the buyback logic, but the key still depends on whether there is genuine revenue supporting the floor. The 50/50 split seems quite fair, but how the ecosystem construction half is allocated is what really matters. 1250 units sound like a lot, but how is this number base calculated? Without some reference, it feels a bit vague. The idea of incentivizing through binding interests is something every project talks about, but the ones that need to run still end up running as usual.

View OriginalReply0