Retail investors are pulling back from the traditional 60/40 stock-bond allocation model, according to JPMorgan's latest research. The shift is significant—it marks a notable change in how everyday traders are positioning their portfolios.
So what are they moving into? The data suggests a broader diversification play. Instead of sticking with conventional equity-fixed income splits, retail flows are trending toward alternative asset classes. Some are exploring higher-yield opportunities, while others are tilting toward inflation-hedging plays and emerging asset categories.
This behavioral shift reflects changing market conditions and investor sentiment. As traditional bond yields fluctuate and equity volatility persists, retail traders are increasingly questioning whether the textbook 60/40 formula still fits their risk tolerance and return expectations.
The takeaway? The old playbook isn't dead, but it's being rewritten. Investors are thinking harder about what diversification actually means in today's environment.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
20 Likes
Reward
20
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MetaReckt
· 3h ago
The 60/40 old classic really should retire; I've already been experimenting with other options.
View OriginalReply0
ChainWallflower
· 4h ago
The 60/40 strategy is already out of date. I'm now experimenting with various alternative assets; higher returns make it more interesting.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainTherapist
· 4h ago
The 60/40 approach should have died long ago. It's a bit late to realize now... The key is whether we can catch this wave of alternative assets.
View OriginalReply0
CafeMinor
· 4h ago
60/40 has been outdated for a while now; everyone is now into alternative assets, which sounds like gambling...
View OriginalReply0
LayerZeroHero
· 4h ago
60/40 is outdated; retail investors are all trying new tricks now.
View OriginalReply0
DeFiDoctor
· 4h ago
The 60/40 old template indeed needs to be phased out, but looking at JPMorgan's data, I have to say—retail investors shifting towards "alternative assets" is a bit like giving bad debt a new name, with no fundamental diagnosis. The real issue isn't changing the allocation, but whether liquidity indicators have truly improved.
View OriginalReply0
MidnightGenesis
· 4h ago
On-chain data shows retail retail investors are quietly shifting positions, and there must be deeper logic behind it... It’s worth noting that the flow is not into traditional assets. The interesting part is that they are testing alternative assets, and this change is not simple.
Retail investors are pulling back from the traditional 60/40 stock-bond allocation model, according to JPMorgan's latest research. The shift is significant—it marks a notable change in how everyday traders are positioning their portfolios.
So what are they moving into? The data suggests a broader diversification play. Instead of sticking with conventional equity-fixed income splits, retail flows are trending toward alternative asset classes. Some are exploring higher-yield opportunities, while others are tilting toward inflation-hedging plays and emerging asset categories.
This behavioral shift reflects changing market conditions and investor sentiment. As traditional bond yields fluctuate and equity volatility persists, retail traders are increasingly questioning whether the textbook 60/40 formula still fits their risk tolerance and return expectations.
The takeaway? The old playbook isn't dead, but it's being rewritten. Investors are thinking harder about what diversification actually means in today's environment.