Many people still view Falcon Finance through a traditional mindset: collateral → stability → usage → end. But if you observe it within the entire DeFi ecosystem, you'll see a completely different side — it is not at all about the endgame of stablecoins, but about building middleware for the system. This difference in positioning may seem subtle, but it actually represents two entirely different levels.

The core demand of traditional stablecoin projects is very simple: how to get more people to use me? So they compete on payment scenarios, trading pair depth, market-making scale, and on-chain coverage. The competition logic is about capturing users.

Falcon Finance's approach is entirely opposite. It is not eager to prove its usefulness; instead, it is doing something more covert — making the entire system dependent on it during operation. It’s not about grabbing users but embedding itself into the process itself.

What’s even more interesting is the way USD is used. Traditional stablecoins’ USD is taken away — used for payments, trading, and storage. But Falcon’s USD is more like being repeatedly consumed and continuously cycled within the system. It appears in structural connections, strategy transitions, cycle nodes, and value transfer between modules. You rarely see it packaged into a story like “I want to use it for this,” but its presence during system operation is extremely frequent.

What does this indicate? Its true positioning is closer to infrastructure rather than application layer.