Recently browsing through the social media updates, I noticed an interesting phenomenon—eight out of ten KOLs are promoting "quantitative automated earning scripts," while the remaining two are sharing screenshots of "earning 5% daily." The comment section is full of newbies asking for links, and seeing this scene really makes me a bit angry. As an observer who has been involved in the crypto space for many years, I must clarify: truly profitable quantitative strategies have long been quietly making big money; no one is going to package them into courses selling for 599 or 1999 yuan to retail investors.
Let me give beginners a quick explanation of what quantitative trading actually is. Institutional-level quantitative trading relies on complex mathematical models, massive historical data backtesting, and then executing trading instructions automatically through programs. The core logic is "data-driven + risk management." To put it simply, this is not some "one-click passive income" magic trick, but a rigorous scientific methodology.
What about those so-called "quantitative tools" sold to retail investors on the market? Essentially, they are just wrapped in a layer of "quantitative" branding, but the underlying logic is not truly quantitative at all. I have personally seen the most exaggerated case—claiming "perpetual profit without loss," but when opened, the entire system relies on basic technical indicators like moving average crossovers, without even a decent stop-loss mechanism. Some users buy these tools, and when the market fluctuates, they get liquidated immediately. When they try to seek redress from the seller, they are blocked.
Since the risks are so high, let's talk about three pitfalls that must be avoided. The first and most obvious pitfall—any claims of "perpetual profit, zero risk, stable returns"—should be outright ignored. There are no guarantees in financial markets; such statements violate basic logic. The second pitfall is exaggerated backtest data—some sellers cherry-pick market data to show "historical returns," but these figures often cannot withstand real market conditions. The third and most covert pitfall—not revealing the algorithm logic, lacking genuine user feedback, and offering no after-sales support—products like these are basically just scams to fleece users.
My simple advice to everyone: be cautious of any promises of quick wealth. Spend more time understanding the basic principles of trading; this is far more reliable than spending money on so-called "secret weapons." Opportunities in the crypto market are plentiful, but the prerequisite is that you need to survive long enough to see those opportunities.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SigmaValidator
· 12h ago
It's the same old story again, the same script every time. Items bought for 1999 would have already been sold if they could make a profit.
View OriginalReply0
DataPickledFish
· 12h ago
Really, looking at these scammers making up stories day after day, I’m almost vomiting. I’ve said it before, who the hell would come out to sell courses if they were truly making money.
---
I know the guy who got liquidated; he was still showing off in the group when he bought, but ended up losing everything and disappearing.
---
Daring to boast about moving averages crossing as if it’s a quantitative strategy? That’s really underestimating retail investors.
---
Always making a profit without losses is just ridiculous. If you still believe in this stuff these days, you really need to reflect on yourself.
---
I just want to know if those screenshots are also faked, haha.
---
Instead of buying this junk script, it’s better to learn some basic knowledge yourself; it’s much more reliable.
---
Another harvesting season has begun, and newbies are still chasing links. Truly hopeless.
---
No guarantees, no disclosed logic— isn’t this just a sign of pure money grabbing?
---
Whenever I see "stable returns," I just block immediately. Such a classic scammer opening line.
---
I’ve gotten used to this phenomenon in the crypto circle; it’s just a cycle of leeks and sickles.
View OriginalReply0
SeasonedInvestor
· 12h ago
Really, every time I see these 599 courses, I want to laugh. If you could make a profit, you would have already achieved financial freedom and wouldn't be selling courses.
---
Claiming to always profit without loss just because of moving average crossovers—I've seen this trick since 2018. Even dead people can come back to life.
---
That part where someone gets blacklisted after a margin call is so real. There are still many people lining up to pay IQ tax for such products.
---
You can't learn quantitative trading from institutions, and retail traders selling quantitative strategies—those are even less learnable. That's the truth.
---
Why insist on paying for secrets? Isn't it better to spend time studying candlestick charts yourself? Living is the prerequisite for making money.
---
Eight out of ten KOLs (Key Opinion Leaders) are just harvesting leek (retail investors). Honestly, I think that ratio should be higher.
---
The most outrageous thing is that there are still many people in the comment section asking for links. I really admire the courage of these newcomers.
---
The term "zero risk" should be immediately reported when seen. If it's not a scam, what is it?
---
I've seen too many stories of margin calls leading to rights protection and being blacklisted. It's always the same routine.
---
Instead of spending money on tools, it's better to run your own data. At least what you learn will be your own.
View OriginalReply0
NewDAOdreamer
· 12h ago
It's truly unbelievable, once again using this scheme to exploit beginners.
I just want to ask those who bought the $599 courses, if they are really making money, why do they still need to sell courses?
Claiming to always profit from moving average crossovers—how shameless can they be?
Someone should have clarified this matter long ago.
View OriginalReply0
Anon32942
· 12h ago
It's those scam scripts that cut the leeks again. I'm just puzzled—who would sell something genuinely profitable for just 1999 bucks?
Recently browsing through the social media updates, I noticed an interesting phenomenon—eight out of ten KOLs are promoting "quantitative automated earning scripts," while the remaining two are sharing screenshots of "earning 5% daily." The comment section is full of newbies asking for links, and seeing this scene really makes me a bit angry. As an observer who has been involved in the crypto space for many years, I must clarify: truly profitable quantitative strategies have long been quietly making big money; no one is going to package them into courses selling for 599 or 1999 yuan to retail investors.
Let me give beginners a quick explanation of what quantitative trading actually is. Institutional-level quantitative trading relies on complex mathematical models, massive historical data backtesting, and then executing trading instructions automatically through programs. The core logic is "data-driven + risk management." To put it simply, this is not some "one-click passive income" magic trick, but a rigorous scientific methodology.
What about those so-called "quantitative tools" sold to retail investors on the market? Essentially, they are just wrapped in a layer of "quantitative" branding, but the underlying logic is not truly quantitative at all. I have personally seen the most exaggerated case—claiming "perpetual profit without loss," but when opened, the entire system relies on basic technical indicators like moving average crossovers, without even a decent stop-loss mechanism. Some users buy these tools, and when the market fluctuates, they get liquidated immediately. When they try to seek redress from the seller, they are blocked.
Since the risks are so high, let's talk about three pitfalls that must be avoided. The first and most obvious pitfall—any claims of "perpetual profit, zero risk, stable returns"—should be outright ignored. There are no guarantees in financial markets; such statements violate basic logic. The second pitfall is exaggerated backtest data—some sellers cherry-pick market data to show "historical returns," but these figures often cannot withstand real market conditions. The third and most covert pitfall—not revealing the algorithm logic, lacking genuine user feedback, and offering no after-sales support—products like these are basically just scams to fleece users.
My simple advice to everyone: be cautious of any promises of quick wealth. Spend more time understanding the basic principles of trading; this is far more reliable than spending money on so-called "secret weapons." Opportunities in the crypto market are plentiful, but the prerequisite is that you need to survive long enough to see those opportunities.