Looking back at the end of 2025, Bitcoin and gold have long surpassed the "each going their own way" situation. Now they are competing for the same pool of safe-haven funds, just with completely different strategies.
Gold plays the long-term stability game. History doesn't lie — whenever major troubles arise, whether it's war, runaway inflation, or banking system collapses, gold can be sold smoothly. Its confidence is simple: no internet, no electricity, no intermediaries needed. A bar of gold is money, and this rule has remained unchanged for thousands of years.
Bitcoin's advantage lies in another dimension. Censorship resistance and borderless transfers may seem insignificant in normal times, but in extreme scenarios — for example, when you need to quickly transfer a large amount of wealth amid war — Bitcoin's portability can directly outshine gold. But this coin has a downside: it relies on the internet and electricity, experiences huge price jumps, and can even plunge due to liquidity issues at critical moments. The 2022 Fed rate hike cycle saw both crash together, which shows what this means.
Which to choose? Gold has been proven as the king of safe-haven assets for the past five thousand years, while Bitcoin could be a dark horse in the next fifty years. If prioritizing sleep quality, choose gold; if you can tolerate insomnia and volatility, bet on Bitcoin's future potential.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SchrodingerWallet
· 4h ago
Without internet during the war, Bitcoin is useless; gold never goes out of style.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-3824aa38
· 4h ago
Without internet and power during the war, Bitcoin is useless too. I haven't fully thought this through.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunter007
· 4h ago
No internet or power during the war? Uh... how do I transfer Bitcoin?
View OriginalReply0
PonziDetector
· 4h ago
Gold has been stable for five thousand years, while Bitcoin hasn't even reached fifty years yet. There's an inherent problem with this comparison.
View OriginalReply0
SoliditySurvivor
· 4h ago
It sounds good, but in reality, in extreme scenarios, having internet or not having internet doesn't matter; the key is having someone to take over.
View OriginalReply0
MidnightTrader
· 4h ago
Gold has remained unchanged for thousands of years, while Bitcoin still relies on the network. Can it really be used in critical moments?
Looking back at the end of 2025, Bitcoin and gold have long surpassed the "each going their own way" situation. Now they are competing for the same pool of safe-haven funds, just with completely different strategies.
Gold plays the long-term stability game. History doesn't lie — whenever major troubles arise, whether it's war, runaway inflation, or banking system collapses, gold can be sold smoothly. Its confidence is simple: no internet, no electricity, no intermediaries needed. A bar of gold is money, and this rule has remained unchanged for thousands of years.
Bitcoin's advantage lies in another dimension. Censorship resistance and borderless transfers may seem insignificant in normal times, but in extreme scenarios — for example, when you need to quickly transfer a large amount of wealth amid war — Bitcoin's portability can directly outshine gold. But this coin has a downside: it relies on the internet and electricity, experiences huge price jumps, and can even plunge due to liquidity issues at critical moments. The 2022 Fed rate hike cycle saw both crash together, which shows what this means.
Which to choose? Gold has been proven as the king of safe-haven assets for the past five thousand years, while Bitcoin could be a dark horse in the next fifty years. If prioritizing sleep quality, choose gold; if you can tolerate insomnia and volatility, bet on Bitcoin's future potential.