There's a fundamental question worth asking: why do we instinctively defer to "the experts"? Think about it differently—throughout history, blind trust in authority figures hasn't strengthened science or democracy. It's actually been the hallmark of religious dogma and authoritarian systems. Real scientific progress? It comes from questioning, testing, and healthy skepticism. True democracy thrives on informed debate, not passive acceptance. The moment we stop interrogating those we're told to trust, we've surrendered critical thinking itself. That's the distinction nobody seems to make anymore.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
DeFiChefvip
· 01-01 11:35
That's correct, but the current problem is that most people don't have time to verify anything, and they are overwhelmed by information bombardment.
View OriginalReply0
Gm_Gn_Merchantvip
· 2025-12-29 20:51
NGL, this argument sounds good, but in reality, how many people can actually implement it? Most still have to trust experts, or what would medicine do?
View OriginalReply0
TradFiRefugeevip
· 2025-12-29 20:40
That's a good question, but the real issue is how many people are truly willing to question? Most still choose to lie flat and accept it.
View OriginalReply0
GasBanditvip
· 2025-12-29 20:34
That's right, this is the spirit of Web3. Decentralization is an inevitable result of questioning authority.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)