When looking at oracle projects like Apro Oracle, my mind isn't focused on those good times—price stability, sufficient depth, and all metrics looking great.

What truly concerns me is another scenario: what happens when the market starts to go crazy. Price swings, liquidity disappearing, systems trampling over each other—this is the real test of an infrastructure's true value.

Most systems in the DeFi ecosystem are actually designed for favorable conditions. Growing curves look beautiful, integrations and collaborations keep increasing, and the data dashboards seem flawless. But all of this is based on an implicit assumption: the market will never truly go insane.

I've stepped into many pitfalls, and only later did I realize a truth—it's too easy to be fooled by success indicators. High-frequency updates, 99.9% availability, a bunch of well-known partner logos—these can coexist perfectly with disasters during crises. The real issue isn't how fast the data updates, but whether that data can stand the test of scrutiny.

When large-scale liquidations happen, asset values plummet, and users start questioning the system, can the oracle provide a reasonable explanation? Why is that price considered fair? What's the logic behind the data sources?

Apro Oracle gives me the impression that it has always regarded these "bad times" as a core premise in its design, not just an afterthought. This approach may not produce the most beautiful metrics, but it might be more trustworthy. Truly reliable infrastructure ultimately reveals its true nature only under stress testing.