2025-12-29 18:28:26

There are new developments in the privacy coin sector. ZEC has always been regarded as a representative privacy solution, but the emergence of Beldex (BDX) is beginning to shake up this situation.

What is the core difference? BDX adopts a default fully private scheme, while ZEC is a semi-private design with optional privacy. This means that the former makes no compromises on privacy—every transaction is inherently private, and users don't need to make additional choices. In contrast, the optional nature of ZEC's privacy feature can be a weakness, as not everyone will proactively enable privacy.

From the perspective of exchange deployment, BDX has officially launched on several top platforms, and institutional holdings are quietly increasing. Signals of rotation in the privacy sector are becoming more evident. If you're still struggling with the issue of buying at high prices, consider this direction. There is indeed a window of opportunity, but more importantly, it's about choosing the right sector.

ZEC-6,36%

BDX0,44%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

FudVaccinator

· 2025-12-30 22:22

BDX's default full privacy is indeed impressive, and the ZEC-style optional mechanism should have been phased out long ago. ZEC has been hyped for so long but remains half-baked, which is outrageous. Institutions are quietly accumulating BDX, and those in the know have already jumped in this morning. Picking up at high levels isn't scary; what's scary is choosing the wrong track. This time, they've chosen the right one.

View OriginalReply0

OnchainDetective

· 2025-12-30 09:16

Default full privacy vs optional privacy, the difference is indeed significant. BDX's move directly hits ZEC's Achilles' heel. Wait, are institutions quietly accumulating BDX? We need to keep a close watch. Why haven't ZEC thought of changing over the years? How many opportunities have been missed? It really shows that choosing the right track is more important than anything else. Otherwise, even the strongest coin is useless. This round of privacy coin rotation seems to be coming, but we also need to be cautious of risks, friends.

View OriginalReply0

YieldHunter

· 2025-12-29 18:55

ngl, default privacy sounds good on paper but if you look at the data... regulatory pressure's gonna hit bdx way harder than zec. technically speaking, optional privacy = plausible deniability for exchanges lmao. still watching the tvl movements tho, correlation coefficients don't lie

Reply0

wrekt_but_learning

· 2025-12-29 18:47

Defaulting to full privacy is the way to go; the optional design of ZEC should have been phased out long ago. BDX is indeed interesting this time; institutions are quietly accumulating. Stop obsessing over entry prices; as long as the track is right, it’s fine. Is the privacy coin sector about to undergo another reshuffle... need to do some research. ZEC’s stance seems a bit passive; is it really no longer viable? It looks like the privacy sector is finally about to have some changes; BDX is worth paying attention to. Optional privacy is a false proposition; it must be default, brother. Institutions are stacking up BDX holdings; the signals are very clear.

View OriginalReply0

NFTRegretful

· 2025-12-29 18:43

Default full privacy vs optional semi-privacy, the difference is indeed significant. ZEC's optional mechanism is really digging its own grave; it's a waste for users who are too lazy to enable privacy features. BDX's recent move to top-tier exchanges for institutional bottom-fishing does carry some signaling meaning. But to be honest, privacy coins are inherently a game of cat and mouse with regulators, and no one can say when the window of opportunity will close.

View OriginalReply0