Consider this scenario: a foreign entity orchestrates a multi-billion dollar fraud scheme in Dubai. The response? Targeted raids, prosecutions, stiff sentences. The government moves decisively. Fast-forward to another jurisdiction—same scale fraud, same financial damage to the state. What happens? Investigations stall. Evidence gathering delays. No enforcement action. The contrast is jarring. It raises hard questions about regulatory priorities, institutional capacity, and whether enforcement frameworks actually protect stakeholders or simply react selectively. For crypto participants monitoring jurisdictional risks, this disparity matters—it shapes where capital flows, which platforms operate with scrutiny, and where oversight remains performative.