If borrowers fail to repay their loans, their tokens remain permanently locked—meaning they lose all ability to liquidate positions.
This creates two distinct outcomes:
1) **Successful repayment scenario**: A user deploys the protocol, takes a loan, generates returns with borrowed capital, and repays the obligation. This strengthens the protocol treasury while maintaining healthy tokenomics.
2) **Default scenario**: Locked tokens serve as economic punishment and collateral protection, naturally incentivizing timely repayment and disciplining the borrowing behavior across the ecosystem.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MoodFollowsPrice
· 01-01 14:05
This design is pretty harsh—defaulting on debt results in the tokens being permanently frozen... Basically, it's an automatic punishment mechanism with no room for negotiation.
View OriginalReply0
GamefiGreenie
· 2025-12-29 20:02
Hmm... Permanent locking sounds pretty harsh, it's like a gambler's final ultimatum.
View OriginalReply0
NFTArchaeologist
· 2025-12-29 18:55
Bro, this design is pretty harsh. It directly freezes your token permanently, which basically makes it impossible for you to turn things around.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHarvester
· 2025-12-29 18:52
Wow, this penalty mechanism is a bit harsh—does it mean permanent lockout upon default?
View OriginalReply0
RektDetective
· 2025-12-29 18:50
Hmm... permanently locking the position is a ruthless move, directly cutting off the escape route.
View OriginalReply0
liquidation_surfer
· 2025-12-29 18:41
Wow, permanently locking tokens? Isn't that essentially a form of destruction? It's actually pretty harsh for the ecosystem.
View OriginalReply0
Layer2Observer
· 2025-12-29 18:28
Hmm... this permanent lock-in mechanism sounds very strict, but I have to ask—during extreme market volatility, do borrowers really have enough time to complete arbitrage? Or is this essentially a gamble on stability?
Here's what makes this particularly interesting:
If borrowers fail to repay their loans, their tokens remain permanently locked—meaning they lose all ability to liquidate positions.
This creates two distinct outcomes:
1) **Successful repayment scenario**: A user deploys the protocol, takes a loan, generates returns with borrowed capital, and repays the obligation. This strengthens the protocol treasury while maintaining healthy tokenomics.
2) **Default scenario**: Locked tokens serve as economic punishment and collateral protection, naturally incentivizing timely repayment and disciplining the borrowing behavior across the ecosystem.