APRO is essentially an execution-oriented oracle, which is quite different from traditional data feed services. Its design logic is very interesting — assuming that future on-chain systems will rely more and more on autonomous processes, these processes not only require data support but also need verifiable execution logic tightly integrated with the data.
From the protocol layer, APRO makes a key separation: requests and execution are separated. On-chain requests are expressed in a structured format with clear constraints. The brilliance of this design lies in — it provides more flexibility to the execution layer while ensuring transparency and verifiability.
This differs significantly from traditional oracle approaches. It’s not simply about bringing external data onto the chain, but about incorporating the entire execution process into a trusted framework. For applications requiring complex on-chain automation, this approach is indeed more fitting.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
fren_with_benefits
· 13h ago
Oh wow, separating request and execution is definitely a smarter approach than the traditional oracle method of just搬数据.
Flexibility in execution seems to be the key point, otherwise what's the essential difference from other price feeding services?
View OriginalReply0
New_Ser_Ngmi
· 15h ago
The selling point is good, but I'm just worried it might be one of those impressive-looking things that end up being full of pitfalls when you actually use it.
View OriginalReply0
HodlKumamon
· 2025-12-29 18:50
Oh, I like this architecture design. Finally, someone has truly separated requests and execution.
---
The simple price feeding system should have been phased out long ago. The APRO approach indeed hits the pain points.
---
Wait, verifiable execution logic... Does this mean on-chain automation can finally shed the black box?
---
Separation of requests and execution? This is the modularization I've been wanting to see. Brilliant.
---
It feels like this is the killer feature for complex on-chain automation.
---
It's not just about moving data around; being able to audit the entire process—that's real transparency.
---
Splitting the protocol layer so thoroughly—can flexibility and trustworthiness be achieved at the same time? That's impressive.
---
熊熊 thinks this approach is much clearer than traditional oracles. Finally, it's not just talk.
View OriginalReply0
SignatureCollector
· 2025-12-29 18:46
Oh wow, this request execution separation design is indeed quite innovative, compared to the traditional oracle approach of just搬 data.
View OriginalReply0
CountdownToBroke
· 2025-12-29 18:42
Hmm, this design idea is quite interesting. It feels like finally someone is taking on-chain automation seriously.
APRO is essentially an execution-oriented oracle, which is quite different from traditional data feed services. Its design logic is very interesting — assuming that future on-chain systems will rely more and more on autonomous processes, these processes not only require data support but also need verifiable execution logic tightly integrated with the data.
From the protocol layer, APRO makes a key separation: requests and execution are separated. On-chain requests are expressed in a structured format with clear constraints. The brilliance of this design lies in — it provides more flexibility to the execution layer while ensuring transparency and verifiability.
This differs significantly from traditional oracle approaches. It’s not simply about bringing external data onto the chain, but about incorporating the entire execution process into a trusted framework. For applications requiring complex on-chain automation, this approach is indeed more fitting.