By the end of February, a leading cryptocurrency exchange experienced the largest hacker attack recorded in the industry. The attackers precisely infiltrated the platform's Ethereum cold wallet system through front-end tampering and multi-signature deception tactics, successfully stealing approximately $1.44 billion worth of ETH and its derivatives. This incident triggered a chain reaction in the market—Ethereum's price plummeted nearly 4% within four hours, and the total liquidation volume across the network exceeded $450 million within 24 hours.



After the incident, the exchange quickly used its own assets to fully cover user losses. However, what truly warrants attention are the underlying technical vulnerabilities. Attacks like multi-signature deception indicate that even cold wallet architectures of top-tier platforms still have blind spots when faced with carefully crafted social engineering combined with technical assaults.

Subsequently, the exchange launched a new round of security system reconstruction. The upgrade plan includes: completing nine independent security audits through internal and external collaborations, redesigning wallet operation procedures and cold wallet isolation mechanisms, integrating MPC (Multi-Party Computation) and HSM (Hardware Security Module) dual encryption systems, and ultimately obtaining ISO/IEC 27001 international information security certification.

This upgrade reflects the industry's renewed focus on cold wallet security. The combination of MPC+HSM is gradually becoming the standard for leading exchanges. Compared to traditional multi-signature schemes, this architecture demonstrates greater resilience against key leakage and internal malicious activities. When choosing an exchange, users might consider understanding the specific security technologies employed—this often reflects the platform's true defensive capabilities.
ETH-2,57%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ShibaMillionairen'tvip
· 5h ago
$1.4 billion gone, and you're still talking about security audits? That's hilarious.
View OriginalReply0
AlwaysQuestioningvip
· 8h ago
1.4 billion USD is gone just like that, even the top players can't stop it --- This is what truly matters, not whether you lose money or not --- mpc+hsm sounds good, but how long it can last is a question --- Choosing an exchange based on security measures is a good suggestion; you need to ask yourself about the platform you're using --- Social engineering + technical combo, this trick is hard to defend against --- Cold wallets being hacked, then what truly counts as a cold wallet? --- Another round of arms race begins, hackers vs exchanges --- Is ISO certification useful, or does it all come down to luck in the end? --- You should learn about multi-signature scams; awareness and prevention need to keep up --- Losing 1.4 billion USD and still able to recover quickly, such scale... truly top-tier
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketNoodlervip
· 8h ago
$1.44 billion. How ruthless must multi-signature deception be to fool top platforms? The combination of social engineering and technical tactics is indeed lethal.
View OriginalReply0
potentially_notablevip
· 8h ago
1.4 billion USD is gone just like that, even top exchanges are not reliable --- Multi-signature deception can still be played, it's terrifying upon closer inspection --- Losing money to upgrade security, this trick feels a bit familiar --- MPC+HSM sounds impressive, but will there be new tricks next time? --- The real problem is no one knows whose cold wallet is the safest; everyone is a armchair strategist after the fact --- A 450 million liquidation, time for the retail investors to be cut again --- So now when choosing an exchange, you have to ask what encryption system they use, which is a bit ridiculous --- Even after upgrades, trusting their words is the real dilemma --- The front-end tampering method, whether it can be prevented depends entirely on luck --- Wow, ISO certification just makes us trust them more, but it's still a bit naive
View OriginalReply0
ShibaOnTheRunvip
· 8h ago
14.4 billion is gone, and it’s gone. They still compensate, this is what a leading platform should look like. --- Multi-signature deception? Social engineering + technology? Honestly, it’s still a human problem. --- MPC + HSM dual encryption sounds impressive, but will the next hacker come up with a new trick? --- The term "industry standard" sounds a bit annoying to me. When it really matters, it still comes down to who has deeper pockets. --- Choosing an exchange just based on security measures? That advice is too idealistic. Ultimately, it still depends on whether they can compensate. --- 9 security audits? Feels like a game of self-assessment. --- 14.4 billion... I’ll never earn that in my lifetime. --- Can ISO certification really stop hackers? I have my doubts.
View OriginalReply0
GamefiHarvestervip
· 8h ago
14 billion dollars gone, and all it takes is switching to a new system? That mindset is truly reckless.
View OriginalReply0
PessimisticOraclevip
· 8h ago
1.44 billion gone? This is the security promise given by leading exchanges, hilarious.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)