On-chain data has recently revealed an interesting phenomenon. A leading research institution has repeatedly withdrawn large amounts of ETH from exchanges over the past week. Within just 7 hours, they pulled out a significant amount from the market, with their accumulated increase reaching 27,598 ETH, which is roughly over $83 million at current prices. Now, this institution's ETH holdings on the chain have surpassed 600,000, with a total asset valuation of around $1.77 billion.



A detail worth pondering is that the average cost basis for these ETH holdings is around $3,111, meaning they are currently showing an unrealized loss of $117 million on paper. Despite this floating loss, the institution has not reduced their position—in fact, they are continuously buying more.

Why? Frankly, this doesn't look like a short-term trading strategy. True short-term traders would have cut losses long ago when facing such floating losses, but they simply don't operate this way. From their actions, transferring newly purchased ETH into Aave as collateral suggests they might be engaging in complex strategies like lending, leverage, or liquidity mining behind the scenes. In other words, this institution is using ETH as an underlying asset for capital operations.

Whenever retail investors are scared by the numbers on their screens, large institutions often do one thing—they use unrealized losses to conceal their true intentions. What they are building might not be about "profit or loss" at all, but about placing bets on a longer-term cycle. This contrarian accumulation behavior by institutions is actually a market signal: they have confidence in ETH's long-term fundamentals.
ETH0,45%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
BearMarketGardenervip
· 3h ago
This is what we call perspective. Retail investors are scared off by paper losses and run away, while large institutions increase their positions and plan their strategies. The difference is so big.
View OriginalReply0
consensus_failurevip
· 16h ago
Yeah, this is the strategy of big players. We retail investors are still thinking too shallowly. Floating losses of over 100 million and still疯狂加仓? That's really a logic we can't understand. Moving to Aave for collateralization feels like playing a big game in the next move. Institutions are institutions; paper losses are not a problem for them. The real issue is the yield. To put it simply, they are betting on the next cycle, while we are worried about short-term ups and downs. Brothers still cutting losses at this time, it will be too late when they realize the truth.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingersFOMOvip
· 16h ago
This is the game of capital. Retail investors are still looking at the numbers on the books, while they are already playing chess. Daring to buy with a floating loss of over 100 million, this move looks suspicious. What are they truly confident in? Moving funds into Aave for collateral seems to be laying out a deeper strategy. Let's not guess. The key is that such contrarian buying behavior suggests they genuinely believe in it, or there are other strategies behind the scenes that we can't see. Anyway, I don't have the guts to keep pouring money in when I'm floating in losses, haha. Institutions can play the game of borrowing and leveraging, while we're still debating whether prices will go up or down. The difference is worlds apart. That's probably why they always make money, and we always suffer losses.
View OriginalReply0
tokenomics_truthervip
· 16h ago
Unrealized loss of 117 million still buying crazily? This is true confidence. We retail investors have already run away. Institutions are throwing ETH into Aave as collateral, they’re not playing the game of "how much to earn today," but building a liquidity empire. Short-term traders would have already collapsed and cut losses upon seeing these numbers, but they continue to push the market back up. That’s the difference in mindset. Honestly, seeing this operation makes me feel at ease. They are really betting on the long term, and it’s okay for us to just follow and take some profits. This is what true institutional mentality looks like; even unrealized losses on the books can’t shake their obsession with the fundamentals.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoPunstervip
· 16h ago
Laughing to death, the big shots are down 117 million on their books but still going all in. I’m already considering life after losing just a thousand bucks on my books. Institutional reverse operations are really an art; our retail art is cutting at the lowest point and chasing at the highest point. Switching to Aave for collateral? Wake up, everyone. They’re playing capital operations, while we’re still watching the ups and downs. That’s the gap. Maxed out floating losses and still dare to add positions? Truly brave, or maybe just really clear-headed. We’re looking at candlestick charts and picking our noses, while they’re planning cycles. It’s not the same dimension of the game, everyone.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)