Simply using Farcaster's investment size to gauge Clanker's true valuation doesn't quite work. Both projects are wrestling with growth headwinds right now. That said, there's something to watch here—Clanker could be positioned for a meaningful uptick as we move into 2026. Worth keeping an eye on.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GateUser-bd883c58
· 14h ago
ngl 2026 is really a magical number. Let's see if I can make it to next year first.
View OriginalReply0
Rugman_Walking
· 14h ago
Hmm, Clanker has been a bit disappointing overall this year, but maybe a turnaround next year? Let's wait and see, don't rush to sell blindly.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationAlert
· 14h ago
NGL Clanker has indeed been somewhat underestimated this time. Let's wait and see the rebound in 2026.
View OriginalReply0
bridge_anxiety
· 14h ago
NGL Clanker, this wave really depends on the long term; just looking at the funding amount alone doesn't tell us much.
View OriginalReply0
GasWrangler
· 14h ago
lol using farcaster's funding as a proxy for clanker's actual value is just... demonstrably flawed tbh. the data doesn't support that narrative at all
Reply0
GamefiEscapeArtist
· 15h ago
Wait, comparing valuation based on funding amount? That logic doesn't quite hold up.
Simply using Farcaster's investment size to gauge Clanker's true valuation doesn't quite work. Both projects are wrestling with growth headwinds right now. That said, there's something to watch here—Clanker could be positioned for a meaningful uptick as we move into 2026. Worth keeping an eye on.