2025-12-29 17:30:21

Maybe this judgment is worth pondering: not only will the new generation of users embrace blockchain, but traditional financial institutions will also eventually realize the advantages of on-chain management. Once they are convinced of its security, they will gradually transfer funds on-chain and even migrate core business to blockchain networks.

Think about how the internet took more than ten or twenty years to fully popularize traditional industries. What’s next? Will there be a twenty-year period of complete on-chain finance? From the perspective of bank risk management, the transparency and immutability of on-chain data are indeed superior to traditional centralized systems. If this logic holds, the next major migration of financial infrastructure might happen faster than we imagine.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MoonRocketTeam

· 23h ago

Bank elders, if they really believe in this set, then our boosters are about to ignite, and will be launched directly into another orbit --- Transparency and immutability sound great, but the real question is whether they will truly give up centralized control, which is the core issue --- Twenty years of financial on-chain? Bro, your prediction is a bit bold. I bet five bucks it will be burned by regulators halfway through --- I like this logical chain. It indeed makes sense from a risk management perspective, but do big institutions move this fast? Probably just making empty promises --- Wait, is it good or bad that they are on-chain? Do retail investors still have a chance to get on board? --- It took twenty years for the internet to become fully popular. Blockchain is even more complex. I don't think it will be that quick; maybe more supplies need to be loaded first --- If everything really goes on-chain, then the coins I hoard now might not be considered early anymore, hahaha

View OriginalReply0

CompoundPersonality

· 23h ago

Those bank folks, they really only pay attention when there's a major fund migration. They're still watching and waiting now, way too conservative.

View OriginalReply0

just_vibin_onchain

· 23h ago

Will banks dare to put everything on the blockchain? I think it's a stretch, but on the other hand, transparency is indeed a pain point in finance. --- 20-year migration? Ha, the internet took so long, how fast can blockchain really go? It's still a bunch of regulatory issues. --- I agree. The immutability of the chain is indeed a game-changer for risk control. The little problems in traditional banking systems can't be hidden at all. --- Overthinking it. What institutions truly fear isn't technology, but losing pricing power. That's the real bottleneck. --- It sounds great, but has the security really been confirmed? I still have some doubts. --- If such a day really comes, how will intermediaries survive? Hahaha. --- The logic is correct, but the biggest obstacle is the political cost at the execution level. Don't get caught up in the hype, brother.

View OriginalReply0

governance_ghost

· 23h ago

Bank officials are still relying on paper compliance. Once they truly understand the transparency of the blockchain... they might be completely overturned. The migration of traditional finance onto the chain has been happening quietly rather than waiting twenty years. Blockchain definitely has advantages in risk management, but the key is how regulation keeps up. That’s the bottleneck. Internet took twenty years; will blockchain be faster? I bet it will. The pace of technological iteration has already changed. In simple terms, institutional entry is just a matter of time. The question is whether retail investors can benefit from the dividends. It's a bit overly optimistic. The利益 game involved in migrating financial infrastructure isn't something that can be driven solely by technological advantages. This logic is solid. The risks of centralized systems can indeed be mitigated on-chain in a matter of minutes. Immutability seems perfect, but what if something really goes wrong? Permanent records could become permanent black marks. Security is a hurdle. TradFi hasn't really suffered losses from blockchain yet, so they are still watching and waiting. Full on-chain finance is the ultimate goal, but the process will be messy, and we don't know how many projects will die along the way.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHunter007

· 23h ago

When those bank folks realized this, we should have gotten on board already.

View OriginalReply0