Recently, I saw a bunch of people selling the same traffic hack: wildly commenting under tweets with skyrocketing views to pile up the data. Sounds clever, right? But it's a trap. Fake view counts can indeed increase rapidly, but what about the actual income of Twitter creators? Not a single penny has increased. A balloon that is blown up is still just a balloon; good-looking data ≠ easy money. Instead of playing these number games, it's better to put effort into creating quality content.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
MetaDreamervip
· 2025-12-30 01:49
The trick of manipulating traffic has long bored me; in the end, it's just a pile of chicken feathers. Good-looking data, what's the use? Without real gold and silver, it's just a paper tiger. Instead of piling up comments to boost presence, it's better to refine the content properly—that's the right way. False prosperity will eventually be exposed; no one is foolish enough to buy into it. It sounds clever, but it's actually a scam—how many people are still falling for it? Quality is the king; this truth never goes out of style.
View OriginalReply0
rekt_but_resilientvip
· 2025-12-29 17:59
To be honest, I've seen this kind of thing too many times. The group that刷评论 (spamming comments) eventually got cut off. Pretty data is worthless. Without real gold and silver, it's just hooliganism. Another leek-cutting scheme, wake up everyone. Content is king. Don't bother with those superficial things. This is a typical Ponzi scheme with a new twist; the next one could be you. Good-looking data doesn't bring real income at all. Someone should have said this long ago. Instead of piling up comments, it's much more reliable to improve the content.
View OriginalReply0
TokenToastervip
· 2025-12-29 17:59
The data stacking approach is really outdated; someone has already stepped into the pit long ago, nothing new.
View OriginalReply0
Layer2Observervip
· 2025-12-29 17:59
I'm already tired of this logic. False prosperity can't be sustained at all, and the data chain simply doesn't add up.
View OriginalReply0
ApeWithAPlanvip
· 2025-12-29 17:42
That set of data stacking is really outdated. Is anyone still using that trick? They've already been cut off in a batch.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)