2025-12-29 17:26:23

Many people's logic is "This thing will eventually go to zero, this guy is just a scammer." Come on.

In fact, people have already labeled this person from various angles—"grifter" and "scammer" are common terms. And those accusations? For example, "improper conduct during the daycare closure period" and so on, pile up one after another.

So the question is, what is really behind these accusations? It’s worth sorting it out from the beginning. The market’s collective distrust of a certain individual is usually not unfounded. But blindly following the crowd to criticize and actually verifying the facts are two very different things.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

FlashLoanLord

· 12h ago

Speaking of which, instead of blindly criticizing, it's better to dig into the evidence yourself. Anyway, I don't believe in the logic that "reset to zero = scammer."

View OriginalReply0

MaticHoleFiller

· 14h ago

Honestly, this circle just loves to throw around accusations without digging into the facts. When someone's reputation is ruined, everyone jumps on the bandwagon to attack. Few have actually verified the facts. What exactly is going on with this guy? We need to understand the full story before jumping to conclusions. Following the trend to criticize and doing real investigation are completely two different things.

View OriginalReply0

RugResistant

· 12-29 17:55

When it comes to real argumentation, why don't you bring evidence? Is it really meaningful to just slap labels?

View OriginalReply0

SilentObserver

· 12-29 17:54

Here we go again, always saying others are scammers. Have you ever checked yourself?

View OriginalReply0

LiquidationWatcher

· 12-29 17:48

Bro, I just want to know, how many people have actually looked into these accusations? Most people just believe everything they hear.

View OriginalReply0

LoneValidator

· 12-29 17:33

Really, just shouting "it's a scammer" is meaningless; you need to look at the evidence. Otherwise, what's the difference from spreading rumors? --- There must be something behind the collective distrust, but right now, nine and a half out of ten people online are just repeating others' words... --- Zeroing out theories and scammer accusations are all over the place, but which specific charge can actually stand up? That's the key, right? --- I'm tired of chasing trends. Instead of following the crowd in criticizing, it's better to dig into the facts myself to avoid being led by the rhythm. --- I believe in the market’s collective suspicion, but those mindless re-sharers of "grifter," if you ask them for reasons, they probably can't even explain. --- When there are accusations, they should be carefully verified. I agree with the author on this point—don't start criticizing before you even understand the facts.

View OriginalReply0

MultiSigFailMaster

· 12-29 17:30

Blindly following the trend and having solid evidence are two different things; this needs to be clarified.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidityHunter

· 12-29 17:30

Too lazy to follow the trend, the data speaks for itself. What are the specific numbers for these allegations? What can be verified on-chain? To believe me, you must see liquidity evidence.

View OriginalReply0