If large-scale adoption is truly achieved, shouldn't the price go up accordingly? This logic makes sense, right?
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
16 Likes
Reward
16
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SmartContractWorker
· 2h ago
Mass adoption ≠ price increase, brother. Don't be so naive; it depends on the supply side.
View OriginalReply0
DecentralizeMe
· 8h ago
Theoretically, there's nothing wrong, but reality is often more complicated than imagined... Large-scale adoption ≠ price increase. It depends on supply, market sentiment, and institutional attitude. Don't be too naive, my friend.
View OriginalReply0
WalletManager
· 8h ago
Mass adoption ≠ price increase, this is a fatal mistake for many people. On-chain data is the truth; look at transfer volume, active addresses, and real holdings distribution, not just imagination.
View OriginalReply0
just_here_for_vibes
· 8h ago
The logic itself is fine, but the premise is that there is truly large-scale adoption. Right now, it's all just armchair strategizing.
View OriginalReply0
ValidatorViking
· 8h ago
nah, that's where most plebs get it twisted. adoption ≠ instant price pump. network finality, throughput, and actual validator incentives matter way more than hype. seen too many protocols get slashed to oblivion chasing volume without fixing their consensus layer first.
If large-scale adoption is truly achieved, shouldn't the price go up accordingly? This logic makes sense, right?