The recent trend in the crypto world is quite interesting. On one side, there's the frenzy of meme coins skyrocketing a hundredfold in a day; on the other side, major mainstream coins are trading sideways at low levels. Over the past few days, fans have been asking me the same question in turn: "Should I follow the trend or hold onto the fundamentals?"



My view is actually very straightforward: don't be fooled by those coins that double in value in a single day. If you ask me, the recent 100 million token burn plan launched by a leading DEX project is truly the real "sleep-easy" opportunity for this year to earn passively.

Let's do some quick calculations. These newly surging coins look fierce, but in reality? Nine out of ten lack even the most basic application scenarios; they are purely driven by hype. Their gains rely on emotions, and when they fall, they become "commemorative coins." A fan once complained to me that he lost half a year's salary in a week just by chasing such coins. I firmly avoid and do not recommend anyone to engage in this "casino-style" gameplay.

Now, look at a certain DEX project. As a key player in the decentralized trading sector, how is its real strength? Its daily trading volume ranks among the top in the industry—that's not just a number. What truly matters is its revenue-generating ability—its daily trading fee income has long reached the million-dollar level. This kind of cash flow capability is beyond the reach of most crypto projects.

So why hasn't the coin price been hot? The problem lies in the token design.

This is a critical point: previously, this project's token had almost no "value feedback" mechanism. In other words, the project made a lot of money, but token holders didn't benefit at all. Under such circumstances, who would be willing to hold long-term? It's normal for the price to stagnate. The recent 100 million token burn is essentially a "correction" to the entire token model, and a clear signal to all holders—that the project team is taking token value seriously.

Burning is just a surface story; the deeper logic is what matters. From an economic perspective, reducing circulating supply directly increases the relative value of each token. But more importantly, it reflects a shift in attitude—the project team is finally seriously considering how to enable token holders to gain real benefits.

A comparison makes this clear. A certain meme coin project, the development team is clueless, the white paper is AI-generated nonsense, and funding information is unverifiable. Would you dare to buy the dip? Conversely, this DEX project has years of trading data available, fee income is verifiable, market position is confirmed, and the burn plan is traceable on-chain. This is the real "tangible and visible" evidence.

In the current market, mindset is very important. Those chasing hot topics always enter late and get caught in the wave of being exploited. Meanwhile, investors who truly understand the fundamentals and are willing to wait are the ultimate winners. So my simple advice is: don't follow the crowd, focus more on financial reports, and understanding the true value of the project is the only long-term way to profit.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 3
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
BearMarketBrovip
· 15h ago
Are you trying to fool people into buying knockoffs again? I don't believe that this DEX project is really that attractive. It's all about burns and fundamentals, just listen and don't take it seriously. The story of losing half a year's salary happens every day. I think it's all just an excuse to manipulate the market. Why should I believe your theory?
View OriginalReply0
quietly_stakingvip
· 15h ago
Losing half a year's salary in a week really hit home; maybe that's the difference between gamblers and investors.
View OriginalReply0
ContractSurrendervip
· 16h ago
The destruction plan sounds good, but I've seen this trick several times before. No matter how loud they boast, it all depends on actual trading volume; data doesn't lie. Losing half a month's salary in a week, really, stories like this are too common. The problem is most people can't tell which projects are real and which are just vaporware. Wait, are there other options besides DEX? Feels like the choices are too limited. I think distributing dividends is more practical than destruction; what do you say? By the way, why are so many people still buying those AI white paper projects? I don't understand. Fundamentals are indeed important, but it seems few people have the patience to really research.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)