2025-12-29 16:28:21

I tested an automated trading robot, which has been running continuously from last night to noon today, and its performance is quite good.

The record of these 14 trades looks solid: a total investment of 174u, recovered 189.8u, net profit of 15.83u, a profit rate of 9.09%, and a success rate of 100%. With this pace, if it can truly stabilize, this robot has the potential to become a money-printing machine.

However, the good times didn't last long. During testing, a more serious bug was discovered. This requires thorough debugging; otherwise, if something goes wrong with a tool that’s making money, it’s all for nothing. Technical issues are often the most hidden, and a small logical loophole can overturn all previous achievements. Ongoing troubleshooting.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
3
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

YieldWhisperer

· 19h ago

9.09% looks great, but I'm just worried that the backtest data will look good only to be slapped in the face by reality.

View OriginalReply0

DataOnlooker

· 19h ago

9.09% looks appealing, but with only 14 transactions in the sample, it's too few. Wait until we run a thousand transactions before drawing conclusions, printing money. Once a bug appears, all data becomes nonsense. That's the nature of bots. Net profit of 15.83 USD still needs further validation. Don't celebrate too early. Logical loopholes are hard to prevent; keep investigating and good luck. 100% success rate? I don't believe you. The market is so gentle? The sample size is too small; there's no confidence. Let's see how it performs during a bear market.

View OriginalReply0

BackrowObserver

· 19h ago

9.09% just wants to be a printing machine, close enough, buddy --- Once a bug appears, the previous data becomes worthless paper. This is the fate of quantification --- 14 samples, what can I say? Run another hundred and see --- Wait until the bug is fixed before bragging, or you'll suffer heavy losses --- Logical loopholes are the most damn annoying, often in the places you can't see --- A 100% success rate makes me laugh; this data itself is problematic --- Robots are good stuff, just afraid they'll break down halfway

View OriginalReply0