2025-12-29 16:26:19

The distribution of global uranium ore resources is extremely uneven. Kazakhstan alone accounts for 45% of the world's uranium production, holding an absolute leading position. Namibia, Canada, and Australia follow with 11%, 9%, and 8.6% respectively. Uzbekistan, Russia, and Niger have production shares of 7.2%, 5.4%, and 4.6%. Interestingly, China's production share is only 3.9%, yet it holds significant influence in the global nuclear energy industry. Countries like India, Ukraine, South Africa, and Iran have production shares below 1%. This highly concentrated supply pattern has profound implications for global energy prices and geopolitical dynamics.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

RebaseVictim

· 7h ago

It is too exaggerated to dominate the Kazakh family, and this energy lifeline is really stuck

View OriginalReply0

bridgeOops

· 7h ago

Kazakhstan is almost monopolizing it, how awesome is that --- China accounts for only 3.9% of production but still holds the say, now that's real IQ dominance --- To put it simply, controlling uranium means controlling the energy lifeline --- Namibia, with only 11%, can still rank so high; what's the deal with the industrial chain layout? --- In the nuclear era, whoever controls uranium gets to speak; a simplified version of geopolitical politics --- India has less than 1% and still wants to develop nuclear power, too ambitious --- Kazakhstan is hilarious, just one country can choke the whole world

View OriginalReply0

SmartMoneyWallet

· 7h ago

Kazakhstan's 45% share distribution is truly impressive; the voting power and production are seriously decoupled. China’s 3.9% can still dominate, and this is the ceiling of capital game theory.

View OriginalReply0

MrDecoder

· 7h ago

Kazakhstan's 45% is truly impressive; the energy discourse power is just in their hands. China's production accounts for less than 4%, yet they still have a say—this is true technological content. Wait, Russia is only 5.4%? I thought it was more... Uranium mines are monopolized by just a few countries, making the future of nuclear energy feel completely restricted. By the way, why is Namibia so highly productive? I hadn't paid attention to this country before...

View OriginalReply0

SchrodingerWallet

· 7h ago

Kazakhstan holds the global nuclear energy by the throat. If this deal falls apart, all countries will be panicked.

View OriginalReply0

PumpingCroissant

· 7h ago

Kazakhstan dominates the market, we need to be cautious --- China's 3.9% forcefully claims the loudest voice, this is the way to go --- Did Namibia and Canada suddenly appear on the map? --- Speaking of such concentrated supply chains, if something really happens, global energy will have to shake --- India is less than 1%? I thought it would be at least double digits --- Uranium mining is even more competitive than Bitcoin mining, the resource gap is so large --- The key is, how does Kazakhstan defend its 45%? If the geopolitics get messy, it's all over --- Will China just become self-sufficient? Seems unlikely

View OriginalReply0

Rugman_Walking

· 7h ago

Kazakhstan's 45% monopoly? That's why energy politics are so harsh on the outside but soft on the inside.

View OriginalReply0