LYN recent market movements reveal many details. The continuous outflow of funds at the -0.177 level on the chart is indeed uncomfortable. The market bears are very aggressive, clearly trying to shake out retail investors. But the key question is, who can hold on longer—that's often the crucial point.
My principle is simple: no cutting losses. Instead of making decisions at this moment, it's better to see who has more confidence. In this kind of situation, you can often distinguish who truly believes in the project's fundamentals and who is just betting on short-term fluctuations—these two types react completely differently under pressure.
The funding rate indicator has always told the same story: the more aggressive the bears are, the more likely it indicates that the price bottom might be right here. Many turning points in history have come from this. If we can get through this round, the story might be rewritten.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
17 Likes
Reward
17
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
WenAirdrop
· 10h ago
I support not cutting losses this wave; it all depends on who has a stronger mentality.
---
The fee rate is telling a story. Is the bottom really coming?
---
-0.177 this move is indeed刺激, retail investors are probably洗了一波 again.
---
Hang in there, since it's all losses anyway, might as well wait for a turning point.
---
The fiercer the short sellers, the closer the bottom. I've heard this logic many times, but it's always hard to endure.
---
The key is confidence. Those still here are probably true believers.
View OriginalReply0
FlashLoanPrince
· 10h ago
Honestly, a drop of -0.177 is really hard to endure, but this is exactly when you need to hold on.
Those who can't withstand this round don't deserve to see the rest of the story.
The more aggressive the short sellers, the closer the bottom, and this principle has been proven time and again.
Let's see who admits defeat first.
The funding rate is so high, what does that say about their mindset?
Don't cut your losses, and it's all over; leave the rest to time.
Those who can stay through this wave are basically true believers.
The bottom might really be here; I’ve bet on it.
View OriginalReply0
liquiditea_sipper
· 10h ago
The idea of not cutting losses sounds easy, but how many people can really stay steady at the -0.177 level?
Endurance ≠ higher profits, I agree with that.
Even if the bottom signals are obvious, you need to have reserves. What do you think?
Retail investor mentality, when pressure hits, all the true colors show.
We've heard the fee rate story countless times; who knows if this time will be different?
Confidence enough? I think there's nowhere else to go.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityLarry
· 10h ago
Not cutting losses is indeed a principle, but -0.177 is really harsh. Retail investors can't withstand it, but you can't blame others either.
---
Such aggressive rates make a short squeeze potentially a bottom signal. History has taught us this, but the key is to hold on.
---
Exactly, at this point, the best way to see who truly believes in the fundamentals and who is just betting on volatility is by observing who remains honest under pressure.
---
I admit -0.177 is a bit painful, but I support the strategy of not cutting losses. It all depends on who has a stronger mentality.
---
The more aggressive the shorts, the more it seems like a bottom? I've heard this logic many times, but this time it really feels different.
---
Continuous outflows of funds are indeed tough, but if the bottom is really forming like this... then those who got out early are the ones who lost the most.
---
Who can hold on the longest wins. Simple and straightforward, but it seems to be the case.
LYN recent market movements reveal many details. The continuous outflow of funds at the -0.177 level on the chart is indeed uncomfortable. The market bears are very aggressive, clearly trying to shake out retail investors. But the key question is, who can hold on longer—that's often the crucial point.
My principle is simple: no cutting losses. Instead of making decisions at this moment, it's better to see who has more confidence. In this kind of situation, you can often distinguish who truly believes in the project's fundamentals and who is just betting on short-term fluctuations—these two types react completely differently under pressure.
The funding rate indicator has always told the same story: the more aggressive the bears are, the more likely it indicates that the price bottom might be right here. Many turning points in history have come from this. If we can get through this round, the story might be rewritten.