When browsing community discussions, you often see a heartbreaking phrase: "It爆了 again, next time I’ll definitely break even." The high frequency of this phrase highlights the widespread nature of the problem.
Honestly, many people’s understanding of contract trading is limited to a "gamble a bit" mentality. They don’t realize they have no clear idea of what they’re actually doing. The line between risk and opportunity has long been blurred.
**The Truth Behind Leverage Numbers**
The "5x leverage" marked by exchanges sounds safe, but that’s just surface-level. The real situation is often more complicated.
Suppose you have 10,000 USDT in your account, and with 5x leverage, you can theoretically control a position of 50,000 USDT. But the problem is—your actual risk tolerance might not be that high. For example, you can psychologically withstand a loss of only 500 USDT, yet you open a 30,000 USDT position. Calculating the real leverage: 30,000 divided by 500 equals 60x leverage.
It looks like 5x, but in reality, you’re playing with fire. Slight market fluctuations can wipe out your margin. You become the market’s "cash machine," a stepping stone for liquidity.
What’s more ironic is that after a liquidation, many people’s first reaction isn’t to reflect on their own mistakes, but to shift blame: "The market maker inserted a needle."
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
0xOverleveraged
· 13h ago
It's the same old story, but I just have to ask, can anyone really accurately measure their own psychological tolerance?
View OriginalReply0
failed_dev_successful_ape
· 14h ago
Really, I just laughed when I saw the example of 60x leverage. Playing with fire and blaming the market itself.
View OriginalReply0
SoliditySurvivor
· 14h ago
Listening to liquidation stories here again, it's really the same routine every day.
Honestly, I just don't understand why you have to play with 60x leverage, even 5x is risky enough.
Next time I'll definitely break even haha, I'm tired of hearing that.
Market maker inserting a spike? Bro, first check how you've set your stop-loss.
Spending ten thousand dollars as if it's a million-dollar fortune—this isn't gambling for a win, it's seeking death.
View OriginalReply0
MidnightTrader
· 14h ago
Really, it's so heartbreaking. I've seen too many people say "next time for sure" every day, only to have an even worse outcome next time. The example of 60x leverage is just a real-life portrayal.
When browsing community discussions, you often see a heartbreaking phrase: "It爆了 again, next time I’ll definitely break even." The high frequency of this phrase highlights the widespread nature of the problem.
Honestly, many people’s understanding of contract trading is limited to a "gamble a bit" mentality. They don’t realize they have no clear idea of what they’re actually doing. The line between risk and opportunity has long been blurred.
**The Truth Behind Leverage Numbers**
The "5x leverage" marked by exchanges sounds safe, but that’s just surface-level. The real situation is often more complicated.
Suppose you have 10,000 USDT in your account, and with 5x leverage, you can theoretically control a position of 50,000 USDT. But the problem is—your actual risk tolerance might not be that high. For example, you can psychologically withstand a loss of only 500 USDT, yet you open a 30,000 USDT position. Calculating the real leverage: 30,000 divided by 500 equals 60x leverage.
It looks like 5x, but in reality, you’re playing with fire. Slight market fluctuations can wipe out your margin. You become the market’s "cash machine," a stepping stone for liquidity.
What’s more ironic is that after a liquidation, many people’s first reaction isn’t to reflect on their own mistakes, but to shift blame: "The market maker inserted a needle."