2025-12-29 16:10:15

#战略性加仓BTC On-chain whale CZ wallet has recently made big moves—invested 2 million USD in ASTER in a single transaction and continues to increase its holdings. This kind of genuine financial commitment is enough to indicate some issues.

What's more interesting is the action at the protocol level. The ASTER team allocates 80% of the platform's daily income directly to buyback and burn tokens. From another perspective, this means that as long as trading volume exists, there will be ongoing buying pressure, and the circulating supply is continuously shrinking.

The backing of major investors combined with the protocol's own burn mechanism creates a dual force that can indeed attract market attention. But honestly, whether this model can be sustained is still a question. The key is whether the protocol's actual income can support such buyback intensity in the next cycle. $ASTER $ZBT $DOGE

BTC-2,37%

ASTER-2,79%

ZBT-8,98%

DOGE-2,65%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

IfIWereOnChain

· 14h ago

80% buyback and burn, it sounds a bit suspicious... Can the trading volume keep up? --- CZ's recent bet is indeed interesting, but how long it can last is the key. --- The buyback and burn mechanism sounds good, but whether the actual income can be sustained is the real issue. --- The combined forces sound promising, but the concern is whether the next cycle's income will hold up. --- Endorsements from on-chain big players can definitely attract attention, but ultimately it depends on whether trading volume and income can match. --- A $2 million bet is not wasted; the key is how long the burn strength can last. --- 80% buyback sounds aggressive, but it's just a self-comforting move by those buying at high levels.

View OriginalReply0

bridge_anxiety

· 14h ago

80% buyback and destruction sounds great, but I'm worried about the lack of income afterward It's believable that CZ bets 2 million, but how long the protocol can last is the real question Buyback model looks good, but the key is whether trading volume can keep up Basically, it's a gamble that the next cycle's income won't collapse, which is a bit risky Support from big investors is a signal, but the ability to generate revenue independently is the real key

View OriginalReply0

BugBountyHunter

· 14h ago

80% buyback and burn sounds impressive, but it’s over once trading volume drops. CZ’s $2 million indeed has signaling significance, but I’m worried it might just be the start of bagholders. Endorsement from big investors doesn’t mean the fundamentals can hold up; we’ll see in the next bear market.

View OriginalReply0

MidnightGenesis

· 15h ago

On-chain data shows that CZ's recent actions are indeed worth monitoring, but the 80% buyback and burn ratio... I doubt it can sustain for several quarters. Once trading volume shrinks, it's a dead end.

View OriginalReply0

ThatsNotARugPull

· 15h ago

CZ's move is quite aggressive; investing two million dollars is no joke. Buyback and burn 80% of revenue? Sounds tempting, but I'm worried that the next bear market could cut income in half. The real test is whether the protocol can sustain its ability to generate value. Relying on burning tokens to boost prices is easy, but the challenge is whether there will be actual demand to support the valuation after long-term supply contraction. Large investors entering can indeed generate excitement, but this kind of dual expectation can also easily turn into dual disappointment... Honestly, it still depends on whether the actual user base and trading activity can keep up.

View OriginalReply0