A certain ecosystem airdrop will start at 21:00 on December 29th. The point threshold for this round is 241 points. The raised threshold likely reflects two possibilities: either participation is declining, or the project team is adjusting their operational strategy.

Recently, a phenomenon worth noting is that many old users are starting to lose confidence. Where is the problem?

One is the wear and tear from trading competitions. For example, in trading contests like NIGHT, many people repeatedly place fake orders to meet trading volume requirements, resulting in increased transaction fees and slippage costs. But the rewards haven't been received for a long time, making the feeling of loss very obvious. The second is that the frequency and quality of recent airdrops have declined a bit; last week's "Da Mao" was not much, and gradually some people feel that this is no longer interesting.

What is currently on the table is a choice between two options.

For those who want to leave, it’s advisable to withdraw the parts that have already qualified and then decisively hit the pause button. Don’t keep messing around just because one or two high-yield projects occasionally pop up; that consumes the most energy. Instead, wait until market conditions become more friendly or your risk tolerance is higher before considering re-entering.

For those who want to continue, be prepared. This mode requires maintaining daily enthusiasm; once interrupted, it’s equivalent to automatically giving up all subsequent opportunities. Continuity is the key.

To put it simply, the ecosystem has now entered a stage of refined operation, optimizing project quality on one hand and screening truly active users on the other. Everyone should carefully calculate based on their own effort costs and expected returns. Whether you choose to persist or leave, the most important thing is to have a clear plan and disciplined execution. Compared to wavering indecisively, this approach better protects your time and funds.