In less than two months, I turned an initial 2,100 USDT into 75,000 USDT. The method sounds incredibly simple—never looking at candlestick charts for T+0 trading, not analyzing fundamentals, and having no idea about indicators like MACD and RSI—yet I made money by sticking to three basic principles.
Some of my trading buddies around me are now full-time traders, while others have already changed cars and houses. It’s hard to believe that such a stubborn approach can turn the tide, but it’s true.
Breaking down this "foolish method," there are actually three core points:
**Stick to your position, only move 30%.** Never do T+0 trading or watch the charts to make random cuts. Ignore dips as if they don’t exist, overlook sideways movements, and when prices rise, lock in some profits and let them grow. Compared to those who constantly monitor minute charts and make dozens of T+0 trades, this approach can generate several times the profit during a market wave.
**Follow the trend, stay away from small coins.** Focus on the main cryptocurrencies’ big trends and avoid short-term air coins. This is crucial—concentrating your energy increases efficiency.
**Divide your funds into segments and invest steadily.** Split your capital into five parts, using only 1-2 parts each time. Only add positions when the market confirms stability, and do so based on trend confirmation, not blind bottom-fishing. Every step is planned before execution.
Honestly, this isn’t some advanced technique; the core is execution. Many people have good skills but keep losing money—losses stem from human nature and emotions. This method actually discards judgment, relying solely on strict execution, steady positions, and patience.
Look at the real account milestones: starting with 2,100 USDT in early June, reaching 12,000 USDT by June 21, 39,000 USDT by July 5, and 75,000 USDT by July 18 (with only one withdrawal in between). This isn’t luck; it’s the result of compound interest stacking step by step. Many followers have said the method is too straightforward—just follow it, and they doubled their money. They finally realized that overcomplicating things was unnecessary—previously, they thought they were smart, constantly cutting losses, but now, simply holding has become profitable.
Ultimately, maybe it’s not that you’re not suited for trading, but that you think too much. A simple strategy combined with patience and discipline can sometimes be enough in this market.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
18 Likes
Reward
18
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SerRugResistant
· 01-01 08:54
Bro, I have to question these data points. Is it really true... But the logic is pretty good, and the lazy trading method is indeed often underestimated.
---
Honestly, it's still a mindset issue. Being able to hold on is more important than anything else.
---
Wait, can holding steady for three months really yield 35 times? What kind of bull market would that require?
---
I just want to know if this guy will suddenly lose everything with one operation next month... Such high profits always seem to hide pitfalls.
---
Simple methods are really the hardest to stick to. I just can't hold on.
---
Compound interest sounds easy to talk about, but how can we ensure we don't lose everything at some point?
---
It looks fine, but I bet five bucks that when the bear market comes, all these are just loss screenshots.
---
This approach is indeed quite clear-headed, more reliable than those indicator masters... but it really tests human nature in execution.
View OriginalReply0
DataChief
· 01-01 04:19
Honestly, I've seen this routine too many times. The real question is, can anyone really stick with it? Most people can't last more than three days.
Holding and not moving may sound simple, but it's psychologically difficult... I think the key is mindset, not how amazing the method itself is.
Wait, can I really endure just sideways trading for a few months? I honestly can't do it; I get itchy hands.
Compound interest sounds outrageous, but it seems that some people can actually make money... It's just that I haven't figured out why I always lose.
View OriginalReply0
MEV_Whisperer
· 2025-12-30 10:37
Another post saying "I've made a fortune," claiming the method is the simplest. But what’s the result? Most people still lose money even after following it. Is it really that easy to go from 2,100 to 75,000?
View OriginalReply0
unrekt.eth
· 2025-12-29 15:52
To be honest, I've seen this routine too many times... Every time, some big brother shares their get-rich-quick experience, then a bunch of people follow suit, and finally, the field is full of retail investors. But to be fair, holding on tightly is indeed better than frequently cutting losses, only very few people can stick with it.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-6bc33122
· 2025-12-29 15:52
To be honest, this data looks pretty scary... But nine out of ten people who can repeat it are the kind who are already losing their assets. I just want to ask how this guy is doing afterward.
View OriginalReply0
DevChive
· 2025-12-29 15:51
Wait, is this data real? 35 times in two months? Why do I feel like someone is posting this kind of story every day?
It's not that it's impossible, but... why am I still losing money even when I follow the steps? Is my "foolishness" not pure enough?
I've tried holding and not selling, but it's really psychological torture, brother. Falling 20% is truly hard to endure.
This advice is good for mainstream coins, but small coins are indeed too risky. I paid my tuition on shib before.
Just want to ask, has this account been withdrawn? Or is everything still sitting in there? It seems that the premise of compound interest is to stay alive first.
I think the key is the entry point. Maybe he just hit the right node. Trying at a different time period to see if it can be replicated.
Anyway, the logic of "move less, take more" is solid. I've been learning to be patient lately.
View OriginalReply0
Deconstructionist
· 2025-12-29 15:44
Honestly, I've heard this logic many times before... but the data really is outrageous, 35 times in two months? Are they being truthful or just selectively reporting gains?
I believe in holding on to this principle, but the key is to catch the right trend, otherwise holding blindly just means losing money foolishly.
Focusing on mainstream coins is the right move, small coins are indeed full of traps... but the question is, when can we say they've "confirmed stability"? Isn't that still about market analysis?
I'm a bit curious, how many of the bandwagoners are still holding on now? Or have they already experienced a significant pullback?
View OriginalReply0
GasGuru
· 2025-12-29 15:33
Alright, this data is indeed impressive. But I also want to see the account snapshot after six months. Right now, everyone is talking about doubling.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityWitch
· 2025-12-29 15:33
Alright, this data is really outrageous, but on the other hand, there are indeed people who make money with simple methods. I've seen it myself.
Really, 35 times in two months? I'm still a bit skeptical, but anyone who has watched a few market cycles knows how much resilience that requires.
Honestly, it's all about mindset. Most people lose money because they trade too frequently. Not being able to hold is the real pitfall.
I remember I used to study indicators every day, but the more I studied, the more I lost. Now I just hold without looking at anything.
But this method sounds pretty brainless, and oddly enough, it’s a bit appealing?
In less than two months, I turned an initial 2,100 USDT into 75,000 USDT. The method sounds incredibly simple—never looking at candlestick charts for T+0 trading, not analyzing fundamentals, and having no idea about indicators like MACD and RSI—yet I made money by sticking to three basic principles.
Some of my trading buddies around me are now full-time traders, while others have already changed cars and houses. It’s hard to believe that such a stubborn approach can turn the tide, but it’s true.
Breaking down this "foolish method," there are actually three core points:
**Stick to your position, only move 30%.** Never do T+0 trading or watch the charts to make random cuts. Ignore dips as if they don’t exist, overlook sideways movements, and when prices rise, lock in some profits and let them grow. Compared to those who constantly monitor minute charts and make dozens of T+0 trades, this approach can generate several times the profit during a market wave.
**Follow the trend, stay away from small coins.** Focus on the main cryptocurrencies’ big trends and avoid short-term air coins. This is crucial—concentrating your energy increases efficiency.
**Divide your funds into segments and invest steadily.** Split your capital into five parts, using only 1-2 parts each time. Only add positions when the market confirms stability, and do so based on trend confirmation, not blind bottom-fishing. Every step is planned before execution.
Honestly, this isn’t some advanced technique; the core is execution. Many people have good skills but keep losing money—losses stem from human nature and emotions. This method actually discards judgment, relying solely on strict execution, steady positions, and patience.
Look at the real account milestones: starting with 2,100 USDT in early June, reaching 12,000 USDT by June 21, 39,000 USDT by July 5, and 75,000 USDT by July 18 (with only one withdrawal in between). This isn’t luck; it’s the result of compound interest stacking step by step. Many followers have said the method is too straightforward—just follow it, and they doubled their money. They finally realized that overcomplicating things was unnecessary—previously, they thought they were smart, constantly cutting losses, but now, simply holding has become profitable.
Ultimately, maybe it’s not that you’re not suited for trading, but that you think too much. A simple strategy combined with patience and discipline can sometimes be enough in this market.