2025-12-29 15:10:40

Large inflows often lead to adjustments, and this pattern has occurred several times before, serving as a short-term trading reference. The most recent transfer is quite interesting — a leading asset management institution just transferred 2201 BTC (worth about $192 million) and 7557 ETH (about $22.12 million) to a compliant custody platform. What does this kind of large movement usually indicate? Historical data shows that similar on-chain transfers are often followed by short-term market corrections. So if you're planning to increase your position, be cautious at this moment and avoid blindly going long. The key is to observe the price reaction over the next 24-48 hours to see if it repeats the previous pattern.

BTC1,02%

ETH0,79%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

21 Likes

Reward
21
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ChainMelonWatcher

· 2025-12-31 18:42

Oh no, here we go again. Do big players have to run when transferring funds? I feel like this theory is a bit like mysticism. --- Wait, 2201 BTC directly into custody? Is this really about dumping or truly holding long-term? --- Will history repeat itself? Wake up, the market isn't a machine; every time is different. --- 24-hour observation? I just want to know if we can bottom out this time. Watching K-lines all day is almost blinding. --- When big asset management institutions enter, does it necessarily mean adjustments? How do you explain the wave from two months ago? It didn't follow the usual pattern either. --- I just want to ask, what’s your accuracy rate for this pattern? Don’t tell me it’s just hindsight bias. --- Alright, I have to keep a close eye on the market now. Who asked that chasing hot topics without watching the market would be a loss these days?

View OriginalReply0

MeaninglessGwei

· 2025-12-31 08:48

Is this the same routine again? Do big institutions holding coins necessarily mean a correction? I don't think so. --- Is it really worth being so nervous about 2201 BTC being entrusted? Maybe they just want to manage it prudently. --- The reliability of historical patterns is really questionable. How many times have they actually been accurate? --- 24-hour observation period? Bro, this market can turn around at any minute. Can you hold on? --- Trying to scare people into not adding to their positions again. I've seen this trick too many times. --- $192 million sounds impressive, but real whales make big profits quietly without making a fuss. --- Instead of guessing what big institutions are thinking, it's better to check if your stop-loss levels are solid.

View OriginalReply0

SadMoneyMeow

· 2025-12-29 15:39

Here we go again with this set? Large transfers = market manipulation, I'm already tired of hearing this logic. Wait, 2201 Bitcoins... this number seems a bit deliberate. Short-term correction? What are you afraid of, I've been numb to being trapped for a long time. It sounds good to call it "caution," but it's actually just cowardice. What can you see within 24 hours? That's nonsense. History repeating? The history of the crypto world is just two words—bloodshed. I bet on the opposite side. When big players enter, I go against the trend. Let's see who gets wiped out faster this round. Blindly adding positions really doesn't work.

View OriginalReply0

staking_gramps

· 2025-12-29 15:38

Large institutions move, and the market trembles. We'll have to wait and see how this plays out again.

View OriginalReply0

MEVSandwich

· 2025-12-29 15:30

Coming with the same story again? Large institutions transferring coins = about to dump the market. I stopped believing this logic a long time ago. Wait, 2201 BTC directly into custody? This guy really plans to stay flat for the long term. 24-hour observation period? Forget it, I've already gotten in. Love to fall, fall all you want. This pattern always claims to be effective, but what’s the result? Counter-operation is the real winning strategy. Institutional custody entry ≠ sell signal. Why do some people always get it mixed up? I just want to ask, will this pullback really happen? Or is it another "wolf is coming" scenario?

View OriginalReply0