2025-12-29 14:43:07

Recently, discussions about the market position of a certain leading exchange have reignited. Reports indicate that relevant individuals, after their family members received an internship opportunity at a certain exchange, immediately questioned another exchange at the policy level, focusing on its market monopoly and compliance issues. This move once sparked industry speculation about potential利益输送.

The accused party subsequently denied the allegations, stating that they were merely expressing opinions based on anti-monopoly principles and not targeting any specific institution. However, this incident still touched on industry pain points—issues such as exchange market concentration, compliance review, and fair competition have always been the focus of regulators and the industry.

To be honest, although these events are quite gossip-like, the underlying issues of exchange governance and market order are worth pondering. Risks of monopoly, conflicts of interest, inconsistent compliance standards… these are real challenges that need to be addressed for the healthy development of the Web3 ecosystem.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

8 Likes

Reward
8
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SchrodingerGas

· 12-29 15:12

A typical rent-seeking game, this is a textbook-level demonstration of conflicts of interest. --- It's the same old trick, first involving family internships, then policy output—perfectly illustrating the principal-agent problem. --- What sounds good is anti-monopoly, but on-chain data will tell the truth... --- Exchange concentration indeed needs to be addressed, but pushing reforms in this way? Uh, emm... --- So ultimately, it's still the high interaction costs, a vicious cycle of bad money driving out good money. --- The rent-seeking efficiency of this operation is astonishing. Think differently—where is the market equilibrium point...

View OriginalReply0

BasementAlchemist

· 12-29 15:11

Family members interning at exchanges just to get policy favors? That move is brilliant, really worth reflecting on. --- Beneficial transfers or anti-monopoly, both sound good, but the key is how the follow-up investigation is conducted. --- The industry is like this, whoever holds the fist gets to speak, compliance standards have long been a joke. --- Wait, is there another exchange behind the scenes stirring the pot? --- Monopoly definitely needs to be addressed, but this approach feels a bit... the vibe is off. --- The current problem with Web3 is the lack of transparent regulation, so all kinds of shady operations keep emerging. --- What was promised about decentralization? Instead, exchange power is becoming more concentrated, how ironic.

View OriginalReply0

MeltdownSurvivalist

· 12-29 15:10

Bro, this plot is too awesome. The family internship opportunity was replaced by a policy crackdown. I really didn't see this routine coming. Damn, this is called rent-seeking power. No wonder everyone in the industry is just watching the gossip. How many years have we been talking about monopoly? Now finally someone has exposed it. But on the other hand, this also reveals the root problem of the exchange ecosystem—everyone wants to cut the leeks. The promised anti-monopoly principle, why does it seem to target your opponents? Haha. Web3 needs fair competition, or it will just become an internal game of big exchanges. This exposure is actually a good thing, at least it makes regulatory authorities pay more attention.

View OriginalReply0

VitaliksTwin

· 12-29 15:07

This is a typical case of "saying nice things about anti-monopoly, but actually just taking sides and fighting" Oh my, who really believes the nonsense about exchanges? Conflicts of interest definitely need to be investigated, or the ecosystem will be completely rotten Speaking of which, with more of these kinds of news, it actually makes some institutions seem untrustworthy Instead of gossiping about who is behind whom, it's better to see if these so-called compliance standards are truly consistent How many real actions have been taken after shouting about monopoly for so long?

View OriginalReply0

AirdropDreamer

· 12-29 15:00

It's the same old trick again, family members using internship spots to start "anti-monopoly"? That's hilarious. Oh my, this scoop is too juicy. The exchange circle is just about this kind of thing. Honestly, it's still a money issue. Who can see through it? The chaos in exchanges really needs to be regulated. Retail investors are having a hard time. The issue of利益输送 (interest transfer) is hard to explain. Anyway, I don't trust it.

View OriginalReply0

ForkMonger

· 12-29 14:54

nah this is just governance theater tbh... real question is who's controlling the narrative here lol

Reply0