Talking about the operational tactics of certain perpetual contract platforms, it really leaves people speechless. On one hand, they inflate OTC valuations, and on the other hand, they hint at market trends to manipulate retail investors. With this combination, the fees paid by users in real money become just "data tools" for the platform. What's even more heartbreaking is—people still get witch-hunted.
Isn't this just about expectation management combined with psychological manipulation? Users work hard to contribute trading volume, only to be sanctioned by the platform in return. Anyone who has experienced this knows how disgusting it feels.
Comparing this to platforms like Aster reveals the difference. They welcome highly active traders and never engage in witch-hunting mechanisms. This is the kind of Perp DEX that should exist—treating users as users, not as cash cows. Think about it, if a platform truly has confidence, why rely on such petty tricks to control the situation? Honestly engaging with retail investors as friends is the way to build a sustainable ecosystem.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
NotSatoshi
· 22h ago
Damn, this trick is really clever—turning transaction fees into a "harvesting tax"
View OriginalReply0
quietly_staking
· 12-29 15:12
I've long been fed up with this nonsense; it's really disgusting. The contributors to trading volume are actually being sanctioned—who designed this logic?
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseLandlord
· 12-29 14:56
Oh my, this cutting method is really brilliant—fees, witchcraft mechanism, and implied trend all in one service
After looking at so many platforms, only Aster truly understands what users want. Just be honest, isn't that enough?
Those who have been sanctioned know that feeling—huge losses
View OriginalReply0
ser_ngmi
· 12-29 14:53
Damn it, is it the same routine again? Take a round of fees, then a witch mechanism cycle, so retail investors are just a cash machine, huh?
Talking about the operational tactics of certain perpetual contract platforms, it really leaves people speechless. On one hand, they inflate OTC valuations, and on the other hand, they hint at market trends to manipulate retail investors. With this combination, the fees paid by users in real money become just "data tools" for the platform. What's even more heartbreaking is—people still get witch-hunted.
Isn't this just about expectation management combined with psychological manipulation? Users work hard to contribute trading volume, only to be sanctioned by the platform in return. Anyone who has experienced this knows how disgusting it feels.
Comparing this to platforms like Aster reveals the difference. They welcome highly active traders and never engage in witch-hunting mechanisms. This is the kind of Perp DEX that should exist—treating users as users, not as cash cows. Think about it, if a platform truly has confidence, why rely on such petty tricks to control the situation? Honestly engaging with retail investors as friends is the way to build a sustainable ecosystem.