Heads of major crypto firms are raising concerns about California's proposed 5% billionaire wealth tax. Their argument is straightforward: such a levy could push both founders and investment capital out of the state, potentially weakening the region's position as a crypto and tech hub.
The worry isn't just about money leaving—it's about the ripple effects on innovation. When key players relocate and funding dries up, startup ecosystems suffer. For an industry already navigating complex regulatory landscapes, losing a major innovation center like California would be a significant blow.
Whether this tax actually passes and how crypto communities respond remains to be seen. But the debate highlights a broader tension: how can regions attract and retain blockchain talent while managing fiscal needs?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LightningAllInHero
· 10h ago
California wanted to squeeze the rich like leeks, but ended up scaring away the crypto elites. This move is absolutely brilliant.
View OriginalReply0
ApeShotFirst
· 10h ago
Oh my God, oh my God, is California trying to drive all the big players out? It's really going to blow up.
View OriginalReply0
UnluckyValidator
· 10h ago
California really wants to kick everyone out. As soon as these taxes come, the big players will move out, and then what's left of Silicon Valley?
View OriginalReply0
NftRegretMachine
· 10h ago
Here comes another round of squeezing the rich and the naive. California just won't learn... Now the big shots have fled to Texas.
Heads of major crypto firms are raising concerns about California's proposed 5% billionaire wealth tax. Their argument is straightforward: such a levy could push both founders and investment capital out of the state, potentially weakening the region's position as a crypto and tech hub.
The worry isn't just about money leaving—it's about the ripple effects on innovation. When key players relocate and funding dries up, startup ecosystems suffer. For an industry already navigating complex regulatory landscapes, losing a major innovation center like California would be a significant blow.
Whether this tax actually passes and how crypto communities respond remains to be seen. But the debate highlights a broader tension: how can regions attract and retain blockchain talent while managing fiscal needs?