The wave of collective bullish predictions at the beginning of 2025 is a bit awkward—currently, the market's expectations for where Bitcoin could go next year have become more realistic. However, based on the voices from various sources that have already been released, the majority still lean towards bullishness, just with more solid reasoning.



Heavyweight institutions like Tom Lee, Standard Chartered, Bernstein, JPMorgan, and Citigroup have recently provided price range forecasts for 2026, generally centered between $150,000 and $250,000. These numbers are not pulled out of thin air; they are supported by several clear logical chains.

First is the expansion expectation of institutional funds. Large institutions are still increasing their allocations, but their actions are more cautious yet more determined this time. Second is the continued inflow of funds into spot ETFs—a major factor—this wave that pushed prices higher last year is still ongoing this year. The last key variable is regulatory clarity. Improved policy expectations directly reduce the risk weight for institutions, which is crucial for large-scale allocation decisions.

Industry observers like Arthur Hayes and IOSG also view the situation within this framework, each focusing on different aspects but sharing a common overall direction. From the collective misjudgment at the start of the year to the current cautious optimism, the market is indeed learning how to view these predictions more rationally.
BTC0,56%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
RugResistantvip
· 01-01 03:24
nah the 15-25k range feels... convenient? like everyone suddenly has "rigorous methodology" after getting burned. DYOR but i'm seeing the same patterns that got called out last cycle—institutional FOMO dressed up as thesis. ETF flows are real tho, that part checks out under scrutiny. regulatory clarity is the actual variable worth monitoring here tbh.
Reply0
MidnightMEVeatervip
· 01-01 00:59
Good morning, all night creatures. This wave of 150,000 to 250,000 tokens is basically institutions setting up a sandwich😅. Last year, they hyped it up wildly; this year, they've learned to change their tune to "more solid"—fine, keep arguing that point. Anyway, the liquidity trap is right there. Are spot ETFs still running? What about the source of funds... Can risk weights be directly lowered once regulations become clear? The logical chain is beautiful, yes, but it’s a bit like self-hypnosis during midnight arbitrage. From collective misjudgment to cautious optimism, have you learned to be rational, or are you just using a more decent way to say it... The time cost is right there. The institution's "cautious but firm" translates to: they've already jumped in, and when you follow the trend, the robot paradise will start its feast again. It sounds good, but it’s the same old story—big fish eat small fish, small fish eat shrimps, shrimps eat plankton, and we’re all chewing each other in the dark pool.
View OriginalReply0
ser_we_are_earlyvip
· 2025-12-31 21:04
15 to 250,000? That's quite cautious, but I'm more concerned about whether these institutions will really keep pouring in money or just throwing up smoke screens. The continuous inflow into spot ETFs is hard to ignore; this logic holds. Since the prediction at the beginning of the year failed, now they've learned to talk about data, which is somewhat interesting. If regulations really become clear, that would be great. Currently, it still feels a bit uncertain. It's basically waiting for policies to be confirmed in the US; everything else is just supporting acts.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCryBabyvip
· 2025-12-29 12:31
150,000 to 250,000? Nice words, but it's just gambling with a different name. The inflow into ETFs is enough for what...
View OriginalReply0
RamenStackervip
· 2025-12-29 12:28
Hmm... the figure of 150,000 to 250,000 still sounds a bit conservative. Are these institutions trying to play it safe again?
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketSurvivorvip
· 2025-12-29 12:26
The 150,000-250,000 range is honestly a bit conservative. Do those big institutions really dare to bet?
View OriginalReply0
RektHuntervip
· 2025-12-29 12:26
150,000 to 250,000? These institutions are really good at leaving themselves a way out. Anyway, this range is big enough, haha.
View OriginalReply0
ReverseTrendSistervip
· 2025-12-29 12:09
Playing within the 150,000-250,000 range, institutions are really starting to take it seriously. But I just want to ask, how long can this logical chain last this time?
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • بالعربية
  • Português (Brasil)
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Español
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Русский
  • 繁體中文
  • Українська
  • Tiếng Việt