Recently, I tracked the trading records of a seasoned trader, who made 16 profits, 1 loss, and 1 break-even trade. His win rate is indeed impressive. But he also admitted—recent market fluctuations have been mild, and each trade only yields a small profit, reflecting a cautious and conservative trading style.
He mentioned a core concept that left a deep impression on me: trading is essentially about planning your trades, not relying on luck. Before placing an order, you should clarify three things—where to set the stop-loss, how much loss is acceptable before exiting, and what your risk tolerance is. Whether you follow someone else's strategy or make independent judgments, this loss budget is a must.
Regarding stop-loss settings, he shared an interesting logic. For example, with major cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, some traders prefer a loose stop-loss (e.g., 3000 points), while others prefer a tight stop-loss (e.g., 1000 points). At first glance, the loss range seems quite different. But in reality, a trader with a 3000-point stop-loss might only risk $1000, and a trader with a 1000-point stop-loss can also risk $1000—this difference lies in the position size.
So the logic makes sense: if your stop-loss range is wide, you should reduce your position size; if your stop-loss is tight, you can moderately increase your position. This way, you ensure that in the worst-case scenario, your loss stays within your risk tolerance. In short, risk management always comes before profit.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
22 Likes
Reward
22
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
RugResistant
· 2025-12-31 14:14
This guy's core point really hit me—risk management is truly always the top priority.
---
16 wins and 1 loss sounds great, but if the market doesn't move, you can't make money. That's the real situation.
---
Losing the same amount with a large stop-loss difference? Position adjustment is the key, learned that.
---
Planning trades vs. gambling—so true. How many people just go all-in blindly?
---
Loose stop-loss with light positions, tight stop-loss with heavy positions—that logic is crystal clear.
---
Honestly, you still need to know the maximum loss you can tolerate to feel at ease.
---
Being conservative and steady can also make money; it's much better than going all-in and getting wiped out.
View OriginalReply0
NeverPresent
· 2025-12-30 20:24
That's right, position sizing and stop-loss should go hand in hand. That's the way seasoned traders operate.
---
A 16% win rate looks good, but you get what you pay for. Being steady is just like that.
---
The core is two words—budget. Trading without a budget is just gambling.
---
I suddenly understood the logic of loose stop-loss combined with light positions. I had never figured out before why others lose less.
---
Prioritizing risk management has become a cliché, but few actually do it.
---
The last sentence is brilliant: making money or not doesn't matter; surviving comes first.
---
A 3000-point stop-loss versus a 1000-point one results in similar losses in the end. It really depends on how people allocate their positions. Most overlook this detail.
View OriginalReply0
SocialAnxietyStaker
· 2025-12-28 16:55
Wow, you're so right. Risk management is really fundamental; without it, don't even touch the crypto world.
---
A 16% win rate sounds great, but with low volatility, you can't make big money. That's the real situation.
---
Setting a wide stop-loss reduces position size, setting tight stop-loss increases position size? Brilliant, this is the true risk equation.
---
The key is still that sentence—planned trading is not about luck. Many people die because they haven't thought through these three points.
---
Interesting, looking at stop-loss from a different perspective, it turns out that the loss limit is the core, and the points are just surface numbers.
---
Being steady and conservative with a 16 wins to 1 loss ratio is much more reliable than those chasing dreams of sudden wealth, honestly.
---
This guy has realized it. Most people are still struggling with stop-loss points, but he's already calculating risk budgets.
---
I think the key is this sentence—loss budget is essential. Without this concept, you'll blow up sooner or later.
---
The inverse relationship between position size and stop-loss is explained perfectly. Finally, someone has explained this thing thoroughly.
View OriginalReply0
MEV_Whisperer
· 2025-12-28 16:49
Well said, position management is the key to survival money.
View OriginalReply0
LidoStakeAddict
· 2025-12-28 16:46
Ah, this 16 to 1 record... Honestly, I find it enviable, but upon closer thought, with such a narrow market, anyone can make money.
Wait, the key is that I need to study his stop-loss logic... Position sizing combined with stop-loss points, only then can I control the actual risk? It feels like I was just gambling blindly before.
To put it simply, I still need to calculate in advance the maximum loss I can tolerate; otherwise, even the most stable strategy is just nonsense.
Recently, I tracked the trading records of a seasoned trader, who made 16 profits, 1 loss, and 1 break-even trade. His win rate is indeed impressive. But he also admitted—recent market fluctuations have been mild, and each trade only yields a small profit, reflecting a cautious and conservative trading style.
He mentioned a core concept that left a deep impression on me: trading is essentially about planning your trades, not relying on luck. Before placing an order, you should clarify three things—where to set the stop-loss, how much loss is acceptable before exiting, and what your risk tolerance is. Whether you follow someone else's strategy or make independent judgments, this loss budget is a must.
Regarding stop-loss settings, he shared an interesting logic. For example, with major cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, some traders prefer a loose stop-loss (e.g., 3000 points), while others prefer a tight stop-loss (e.g., 1000 points). At first glance, the loss range seems quite different. But in reality, a trader with a 3000-point stop-loss might only risk $1000, and a trader with a 1000-point stop-loss can also risk $1000—this difference lies in the position size.
So the logic makes sense: if your stop-loss range is wide, you should reduce your position size; if your stop-loss is tight, you can moderately increase your position. This way, you ensure that in the worst-case scenario, your loss stays within your risk tolerance. In short, risk management always comes before profit.