There's something genuinely compelling about how native cross-chain solutions could reshape Bitcoin's movement patterns—it feels like a genuine departure from what we're working with today.



No wrapper tokens cluttering the picture. No custodians sitting in the middle. Just actual native asset movement between chains.

Once you really grasp that architecture, you can't help but notice how inefficient the current setup actually is. The friction becomes obvious.
BTC0,12%
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
MetaNomadvip
· 2025-12-30 19:50
To be honest, when a true native cross-chain solution comes out, this set of interfaces should be replaced.
View OriginalReply0
ForkThisDAOvip
· 2025-12-28 12:50
ngl Native cross-chain has been talked about for so long, but the real implementation still depends on technological breakthroughs... But on the other hand, the idea of cutting out middlemen is indeed satisfying.
View OriginalReply0
SerumSqueezervip
· 2025-12-28 12:32
To be honest, when a truly native cross-chain solution comes out, this wrapper token thing should be phased out... The efficiency is incredibly poor.
View OriginalReply0
IntrovertMetaversevip
· 2025-12-28 12:29
Damn, native cross-chain technology can really make a difference. No need for a bunch of shitcoins as middlemen—that's awesome.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)