Speaking of Polymarket's token issuance plan this year, there's an interesting idea worth considering. If the project team really spends a large amount of money to buy back 20-30M tokens circulating in the market, from a profit perspective, this move is actually the most cost-effective — it can quickly boost the price and create buzz.
But frankly, such large-scale operations usually mean that the project team itself is not short of money. After all, to invest such a huge amount of funds into the market, without sufficient treasury support, it’s simply not feasible. This also indirectly reflects the capital strength behind Polymarket.
Interestingly, this approach is common in the crypto market — project teams controlling the market, community expectations, and price speculation, always seeking a balance among the three. How Polymarket plays this game depends on their grasp of market rhythm.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
HallucinationGrower
· 2025-12-30 14:16
It's the same old buyback routine. To put it simply, it's just having money to be reckless.
Pouring real money into market manipulation, but we're just the spectators.
Whether it can stabilize is the real issue; if the rhythm can't be controlled, it will collapse anyway.
Polymarket's next move depends on whether they have enough momentum.
View OriginalReply0
ruggedSoBadLMAO
· 2025-12-30 13:03
Buyback of 20-30M? Isn't that just the usual move of throwing money to manipulate the market? Same old story.
Polymarket has the money, it's just a matter of whether they dare to really do it.
To put it simply, it's still a market manipulation game; we are all just leeks.
If you grasp this rhythm well, you'll make money; if not, everything is pointless.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidatedTwice
· 2025-12-29 12:07
Basically, it's just being wealthy and indulgent. Investing 20-30M in buybacks is just a small matter.
This is the real capital game. As retail investors, we just watch.
View OriginalReply0
SilentObserver
· 2025-12-28 09:49
Basically, it's just being wealthy and reckless. This move is definitely showing off muscle.
Eating up 20-30M tokens directly, no one else can do that. But I'm just worried they can't sustain it later.
More and more gamers are getting involved, and it feels like the crypto market is being messed up this way.
Let's see how they end up, I'm just an onlooker.
It's the same old story—market manipulation, hype, and harvesting profits, just a cycle.
Having a substantial treasury makes a difference; we don't even have the qualification to participate.
View OriginalReply0
0xDreamChaser
· 2025-12-28 09:49
Buyback of 20-30M? Isn't that just blatantly saying they have money, haha
Spending such a large amount of funds and still pretending to be a good community member, this old trick again
Let's wait and see how they crash and burn
View OriginalReply0
SigmaValidator
· 2025-12-28 09:48
I'm tired of this buyback routine; now let's see if Poly has real financial strength.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationSurvivor
· 2025-12-28 09:23
The buyback move is indeed ruthless, but I'm just worried it’s another tactic to trap retail investors.
Where does all this money come from? It feels like there's big capital backing it.
It's just the classic big fish eating small fish, never-ending.
Let's wait and see how Polymarket handles this round.
This game is a bit deep; if the rhythm isn't controlled well, it could backfire.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketMonk
· 2025-12-28 09:20
It's the same old story, anyone can play the game of throwing money to pump the market.
Buying back 20-30M tokens sounds impressive, but honestly, it's just a new trick in market manipulation.
Only with a treasury dares to go this far; projects without funds simply can't afford this game.
The crypto market is like this, always spinning in a game of chess, no one can walk away unscathed.
Let's see how far Polymarket's move can go; anyway, I'll wait and see.
Speaking of Polymarket's token issuance plan this year, there's an interesting idea worth considering. If the project team really spends a large amount of money to buy back 20-30M tokens circulating in the market, from a profit perspective, this move is actually the most cost-effective — it can quickly boost the price and create buzz.
But frankly, such large-scale operations usually mean that the project team itself is not short of money. After all, to invest such a huge amount of funds into the market, without sufficient treasury support, it’s simply not feasible. This also indirectly reflects the capital strength behind Polymarket.
Interestingly, this approach is common in the crypto market — project teams controlling the market, community expectations, and price speculation, always seeking a balance among the three. How Polymarket plays this game depends on their grasp of market rhythm.