2025-12-28 08:23:44

Inference Labs and Cysic's collaboration is less of a marketing gimmick and more a genuine match of infrastructure-level needs.

The question is simple: how can we make AI model inference results trustworthy? The black box is too opaque, and no one can clearly explain the logic behind the outputs. That’s what Inference Labs aims to solve — using zero-knowledge proof technology to turn the AI inference process from completely unverifiable into traceable and verifiable. In other words, they are building a trust infrastructure for decentralized AI.

As for Cysic, they excel at actually applying this verifiable capability. Verifying alone isn’t enough; these capabilities must also run in real-world scenarios and generate value. When both sides come together — the credibility of AI is addressed, and the application pathways for trustworthy capabilities are also opened. This is not just a simple brand partnership but a natural synergy of upstream and downstream infrastructure, pushing decentralized AI from concept to practical usability.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

16 Likes

Reward
16
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

POAPlectionist

· 2025-12-31 05:41

Zero-knowledge proofs give AI a trust endorsement; this idea indeed has some potential. Everyone is talking about decentralized AI now, but the black box problem has never really been solved. Inference Labs is on the right track. Seeing these two projects collaborate naturally feels more genuine, unlike those purely hype-driven concepts. Wait, it really has to run on-chain to count. Verification is possible, but performance shouldn't be compromised. It seems like someone is finally taking infrastructure seriously. By the way, who else is pushing zkAI in this direction? How was Cysic before, and can this collaboration really produce something? From an infrastructure perspective, it looks very reasonable, but I'm worried it might just end up as a PPT project.

View OriginalReply0

MercilessHalal

· 2025-12-28 15:58

Uh... Zero-knowledge proofs as a trust layer for AI—this idea is truly brilliant. Finally, someone is taking the black box problem seriously.

View OriginalReply0

Degen4Breakfast

· 2025-12-28 08:45

Here we go again with another "infrastructure" story, but this time it sounds less like pure hype. Zero-knowledge proofs endorse AI, with Cysic responsible for implementation and usage. At first glance, it does sound pretty interesting.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-e51e87c7

· 2025-12-28 08:45

Zero-knowledge proofs give AI black boxes a pair of X-ray glasses, which is the real deal --- Another story of "We need to save AI," but this time it seems to have some substance --- In simple terms, it's about setting questions and grading, which is better than both being blind --- Trustworthiness has always been the Achilles' heel of decentralized AI. Finally, someone is taking it seriously --- At the infrastructure level, natural collaboration > marketing blitz, I agree with this judgment --- Wait, could the verification process itself also become a new black box? --- From black box to traceability, this approach is indeed different --- Collaboration is not for co-marketing, but because of genuine complementarity. I like this attitude

View OriginalReply0

rugpull_ptsd

· 2025-12-28 08:27

Wow, someone finally explained this clearly—it's not just simple CP hype. Black-box AI is indeed annoying; this verification step must be added, or who would believe it? What I truly believe in is Cysic; actually utilizing their capabilities is real skill.

View OriginalReply0