2025-12-28 06:21:07

A leader from a major exchange recently discussed a critical issue— the safety baseline of DEX robot products. His core point is clear: the security standards for such products must reach exchange-level reliability, otherwise the risks are too great.

Specifically, the problems mainly lie in two areas. First, centralized management of private keys. Improper handling of private keys can lead to unimaginable consequences. Second, security vulnerabilities in users' local devices are often overlooked, but in fact, this is also a common attack vector for wallets.

To put it simply, security is no small matter. For DEX bots to truly become mainstream, these foundational infrastructures must be solid. #加密资产安全 #DEX Technology #Wallet Management

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MetaverseLandlord

· 2025-12-31 04:47

Centralized management of private keys is indeed a big pitfall; I've seen too many projects fail because of this. --- That's right, the neglect of local device vulnerabilities is really astonishing; users themselves are unaware of it. --- The security standards at exchange level are actually not high; those small bots simply can't meet them. --- For DEX bots to become widespread, the security infrastructure must be in place first; otherwise, after a wave of users gets hacked, confidence will be lost. --- Once there's a problem with the private key, it's a direct loss—no room for negotiation. --- It feels like most DEX bots nowadays are playing with fire; sooner or later, something will go wrong.

View OriginalReply0

metaverse_hermit

· 2025-12-28 06:47

Centralized management of private keys is indeed a flaw; a small mistake can lead to being drained. This is the Achilles' heel of DEX Bot.

View OriginalReply0

MetaverseVagabond

· 2025-12-28 06:40

Centralization of private keys has long been a well-known issue, but few projects actually take it seriously. --- It's about exchange-level security standards, which sound quite intimidating, but most DEX Bot users simply lack that risk awareness. --- That's right, vulnerabilities in local devices are indeed easy to overlook. Many people are still running bots on outdated systems. --- How to balance compliance security and usability? The requirements are too high for ordinary users to handle. --- It sounds like you're endorsing your own exchange. Are other DEXs really that bad? --- Wallet management, to put it simply, depends on human nature. No matter how strong the technology is, users can still shoot themselves in the foot. --- Here we go again, always talking about security bottom lines. Which project has truly achieved that?

View OriginalReply0

ReverseFOMOguy

· 2025-12-28 06:37

Private key centralized management has long been an issue that needs proper regulation, or else another wave of losses will happen. --- Exchange-level security standards? Ha, that’s waiting for the Year of the Monkey, how many can truly achieve it? --- Local device vulnerabilities have been overlooked for too long, users themselves aren’t even aware, no wonder phishing happens so often. --- DEX Bot is powerful, but without solving the security issue, no one can really play it well. --- It’s called infrastructure in nice words, but in harsh terms, it’s just not ready yet. Don’t rush to push for nationwide adoption. --- Private keys and local devices—seems like any link can cause problems. When will we finally be able to trade with peace of mind? --- Exchange-level security? I doubt it. Right now, many small projects are just riding the security wave to scam people. --- I’ve heard this warning too many times. Has anyone actually made improvements? Very few, I’d say.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-e19e9c10

· 2025-12-28 06:37

The centralization of private keys has long been a concern; how many people have fallen here --- Exchange-level security standards? Sounds good, but how many DEX bots have truly achieved this? --- The issue of local device vulnerabilities being overlooked hits home; everyone is just focused on profits and forgetting security --- Instead of boasting about DEX democratization, it's better to first solidify the security foundation—that's the real priority --- I just want to ask, who can truly reach the security level of an exchange? The more you boast, the fewer you actually achieve

View OriginalReply0