Cross-chain transfers, why do they always lose money?
Every time you perform a cross-chain operation, the assets received are always less than expected. The reason for the shrinkage is actually quite straightforward—
Your tokens go through three layers of harvesting: - Exchange slippage on the source chain - Bridge protocol fees - Additional exchange losses on the target chain
Looking at it from another perspective, it's like goods passing through three toll booths; each one charges a fee, and your wallet naturally gets emptier. This model has become the industry standard, and users can only accept it.
But there's another approach—rather than transferring the assets themselves, why not just transmit transaction instructions? This way, you can bypass the multiple layers of exchange logic between chains, significantly reducing the user's actual costs.
Optimizing at the architecture level, rather than patching within the existing framework—that's the idea behind the new generation of cross-chain interactions. Industry-savvy projects are already putting this into practice.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
20 Likes
Reward
20
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GateUser-75ee51e7
· 2025-12-30 18:40
Really, every time I cross chains, I have to take a hit, I'm already numb.
Wait, only transmitting instructions without transferring assets? That idea is interesting, I need to pay attention to which projects are doing this.
The three toll booths are indeed fierce, it seems the crypto world just loves this scythe-cutting model.
Architectural layer optimization sounds advanced, but in practice, will it turn out to be a new pitfall?
Honestly, it still depends on who can truly implement it; don't let it be another PPT project.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidatedAgain
· 2025-12-30 13:09
Once again, crossed chain slippage hit hard, triple harvest, huh? This is definitely a scene of a devastating loss tutorial.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeDodger
· 2025-12-30 11:17
Cross-chain is the industry's blood pump, every time you have to pay several tolls to buy the way, it's really incredible.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoWageSlave
· 2025-12-28 04:51
Here comes the triple play of harvesting the little guys again, truly amazing
View OriginalReply0
0xTherapist
· 2025-12-28 04:51
I have to go through three toll booths, really unbelievable. Cross-chain is just industry-sanctioned robbery.
View OriginalReply0
MissedTheBoat
· 2025-12-28 04:49
Really, every time I cross chains, I end up paying an IQ tax. The triple slippage directly bankrupts me.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-ccc36bc5
· 2025-12-28 04:39
Cross-chain transfers are a money pit; every time, multiple protocols drain your funds. It feels like I'm doing charity.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunterWang
· 2025-12-28 04:29
Damn, the description of triple harvesting is amazing, it's just bloodsucking behavior.
View OriginalReply0
MidnightTrader
· 2025-12-28 04:23
The three toll booths directly cut people off; I’ve long since given up on cross-chain.
Cross-chain transfers, why do they always lose money?
Every time you perform a cross-chain operation, the assets received are always less than expected. The reason for the shrinkage is actually quite straightforward—
Your tokens go through three layers of harvesting:
- Exchange slippage on the source chain
- Bridge protocol fees
- Additional exchange losses on the target chain
Looking at it from another perspective, it's like goods passing through three toll booths; each one charges a fee, and your wallet naturally gets emptier. This model has become the industry standard, and users can only accept it.
But there's another approach—rather than transferring the assets themselves, why not just transmit transaction instructions? This way, you can bypass the multiple layers of exchange logic between chains, significantly reducing the user's actual costs.
Optimizing at the architecture level, rather than patching within the existing framework—that's the idea behind the new generation of cross-chain interactions. Industry-savvy projects are already putting this into practice.